From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 2787 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2021 22:26:29 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 21 Apr 2021 22:26:29 -0000 Received: from duke.felloff.net ([216.126.196.34]) by 1ess; Wed Apr 21 11:01:46 -0400 2021 Message-ID: <2FF47E1B41FE0E76BD9988A0963A51E0@felloff.net> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 17:01:35 +0200 From: cinap_lenrek@felloff.net To: 9front@9front.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: flexible standard markup-aware map/reduce-oriented callback-aware locator Subject: Re: [9front] MB Pro early-2011 support status Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk ah! i just took a look and found this: https://fallglow.com/p9/mb/rev/9830eaea57c9 this stuff is very hard for us to verify without having the hardware. maybe we should adopt like getting a sysinfo proove for all pci vid/did additions to at least have a chance to sanity check it. poking at the embedded controller can have fatal consequences, maybe even brick the machine. -- cinap