From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.236.50.47 with SMTP id y35csp197486yhb; Mon, 7 May 2012 13:09:05 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <9front+bncCIfk-sO2AhDh16D9BBoE4qfxJQ@googlegroups.com> Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCIfk-sO2AhDh16D9BBoE4qfxJQ@googlegroups.com designates 10.229.114.212 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.229.114.212; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCIfk-sO2AhDh16D9BBoE4qfxJQ@googlegroups.com designates 10.229.114.212 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=9front+bncCIfk-sO2AhDh16D9BBoE4qfxJQ@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=9front+bncCIfk-sO2AhDh16D9BBoE4qfxJQ@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.229.114.212]) by 10.229.114.212 with SMTP id f20mr2360975qcq.6.1336421345131 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 07 May 2012 13:09:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:to:subject :in-reply-to:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=B9hC1rTqpZuGjAtrXDHw7p5On+1eJtwS4E1Fb6pdYEo=; b=0gqaG4VcbQg+qgLpCbbW1nlxR/SICsT0M+hp9/fnS3Glbmtl/SE2aI/0PkjQr/yx/2 K1FzPTZ959MDEfPbjbLqkKVOUC4q/Qt4c1hp0KvGsTXU24khOJDKI7z20e1v9jo+an4O Q568kC/pVh6GZV1PTLcV3CFALTkh/T/C4btsw= Received: by 10.229.114.212 with SMTP id f20mr265367qcq.6.1336421345071; Mon, 07 May 2012 13:09:05 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: 9front@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.224.174.206 with SMTP id u14ls3297342qaz.8.gmail; Mon, 07 May 2012 13:09:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.184.70 with SMTP id cj6mr9045608qab.3.1336421344862; Mon, 07 May 2012 13:09:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.184.70 with SMTP id cj6mr9045607qab.3.1336421344847; Mon, 07 May 2012 13:09:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sp.nv ([68.179.132.47]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id c25si7546988qch.2.2012.05.07.13.09.04; Mon, 07 May 2012 13:09:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 68.179.132.47 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of sl@9front.org) client-ip=68.179.132.47; Message-ID: <2c17b913e0ec281fcd51250c278639b5@sp.inri.net> Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 20:09:03 +0000 From: sl@9front.org To: 9front@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: /dev/wsys/*/screen not present for nested rio? In-Reply-To: <3f17e7a5-6970-46f4-b55d-ef0b25a6a627@g6g2000pbq.googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: sl@9front.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 68.179.132.47 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of sl@9front.org) smtp.mail=sl@9front.org Reply-To: 9front@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list 9front@googlegroups.com; contact 9front+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: <9front.googlegroups.com> X-Google-Group-Id: 831096995978 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: 9front@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > I notice that /dev/wsys/*/screen is visible only on the top rio > windows. If I start a nested rio instance, 'ls' still shows me that > the file is present, but on access, it returns back saying file does > not exist. Cannot reproduce. Make sure the screen number you are trying to access actually exists in the nested rio. Compare the output of 'ls /dev/wsys' in both the main rio and from within the nested rio. -sl