From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qk0-f177.google.com ([209.85.220.177]) by ewsd; Sun Feb 18 01:55:38 EST 2018 Received: by mail-qk0-f177.google.com with SMTP id t13so5443992qkj.13 for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 22:55:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/PJl6rpkb7uEcbPqH0rAALRMW+llIAWMuEOTSZi3u9w=; b=XOiJaKJlrSE/kpgGzvqkhF73dlZWr9GuEtgZaDP401aDGQ7gBOplCLfGX1x8890BZq L0L7j8B1zMyxcT/m5gU67AR7l0qTOLrVKUI/wdg6wzGbBb8wfv1RSWd4dM5TCU0woPMo wcoqIHuwKCoXoBoxLPu98Dg8eXSdxQ/3y14vT/KQAORRPqAzOBrPpKFjzCe3FEKpWHz6 GUxKowrJeZlRetdJeGTlE62v3L/gCYh1FOHjIdXPgMGbhsfzCVVfD83D1jXwX05QPpy5 fmBPYW38Hsv1yPIJOhDFheE+Zc2XXLBbOgT/fC9IFayFYX30r5AYYv+0Qo4hnGkx4X0P pogQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/PJl6rpkb7uEcbPqH0rAALRMW+llIAWMuEOTSZi3u9w=; b=jMTgsRiFgv5tcv0S4U3jCUCpMZsfgQ0Msi9B2zC/5j+uOdjY4KHIdbf7WY7Z6nG0jM UPuNzhOtfXmVcbhXSRjzloWg5TZKYuyGW4Kt207Lqkn2vWmuCRTpejyucLjKLC53o1x4 8KyQ8n1Z1CIlFOO+NkO0bJ0GwVV1HYmdG7oxIZTVjo74ZWM2Vtz1BHjlsiiT4Lp0MtXY nEI4T2NUD0MMCs5vB1C0GAhn1/i9bQ8c8w8jQ2ACTPuAW/8247qvEWMeZZ248zDMe+0U /pxJKgo95OekXoe/7E3cr+a66LlHak4dUfC2Cqc7qoYIcbkapHwMCdrIFQiMLouxgWeN NUkw== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBcQ3BN31VNygXiyhJcgIH8nh6WQG33+jwOUH6FhWsnlm29umgG lR6Bvgzqzjdhii2lXtqyD1t4CA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226ekaE3+q1wOpBM/Su4UEMx11KlRNkuXLkuC/EVGOI4fCbOT16/NcH7aSjiX3cFwIxeEyzBFw== X-Received: by 10.55.102.134 with SMTP id a128mr18309860qkc.122.1518936935938; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 22:55:35 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from silverfox.localnet ([50.32.131.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 50sm6843177qty.29.2018.02.17.22.55.34 for <9front@9front.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Feb 2018 22:55:34 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Veety To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] Re: TeX Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 01:55:31 -0500 Message-ID: <3050109.x5PVi1XmgE@silverfox> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (FreeBSD/11.1-RELEASE-p4; KDE/4.14.30; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <5D6B7CB0-DD6C-4165-93B5-888B7985FC79@quintile.net> References: <5D6B7CB0-DD6C-4165-93B5-888B7985FC79@quintile.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: rich-client-aware cache On Wednesday, February 14, 2018 09:15:25 Steve Simon wrote: > why mot have tex(1) manpage which states that rex is not included by default > but gives a weblink for a recommended tex package, e.g. kertex, which is > tested on an9. > > this manpage would then be overwritten by the tex installation. > > everyone happy (unlikely) > > -Steve If someone makes a port for some TeX package that does this I would be okay with it. Knowing that certainly won't happen unless I do it, the references really just should be nuked. If a package doesn't ship with 9front it shouldn't be in they system's manpages. -- Veety