From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 14123 invoked from network); 26 Apr 2021 09:41:43 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 26 Apr 2021 09:41:43 -0000 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]) by 1ess; Mon Apr 26 02:34:23 -0400 2021 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF48DA82 for <9front@9front.org>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 02:34:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap21 ([10.202.2.71]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 26 Apr 2021 02:34:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=biobuf.link; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=a+DBHP3EiNzpu4HqpBua9412WMzlTU9 4xH2nGyWgO+A=; b=OrGf3AeIAiGvAelRkMAEpauzxhUkkwk7q2b9hBWOy/ZAHhx /AWH6U4YEflouL4eAT8KQsvgD3c4hinqlQfe0gqaAZPsybtySicoahO/Avo+LB9y yDHiiA9qzMmJcO8xo4//uqcYqY6e9MY0qCkHn457EFZu2X/1nE9NCN1hac2KOMqW NFYc5Yp6039MmPu+iu2dlQyJCTV+Om7vqhiLQFzFXAhly/DrUGJto2yERJmyzDGJ ZuD5bFgKy3fb2ph/64FpyyWPn+kZlF46N8ZAvEkCEcMff2zV8YyHQKsUpE+hn0+2 02C88wVT4pv92p8Ycc1XoC7yVHgxbQCna14STDQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=a+DBHP 3EiNzpu4HqpBua9412WMzlTU94xH2nGyWgO+A=; b=KN8zhMFanmjAMYMhrFe9dj nEgyWaXx4E7n7wK0Y21MzGajMEc2YWCWoKEdK505suI7HlBWdCsLjQIBYaxrfrr9 PggidQ9Vz9Qu1TnjYocjjYzsz5lcPj4O026kWjQOzo/gZJSv2j/+LllPufw1/vuM 008Cl6U+jsW+vFWLxXguvQcJ4HtbYNI8rX7BmR107XFkEjXN/5KYTwZHGFnbAxno 133AS6HG6d9hqJEclUEvn6mCDmkosQjWy7GbuGBTn7vobwpX9OBAboZDJ6PaNLN4 zOUyhvn+V7BPnseqxOhMLVXZlDmklL4tWSL82OnfpYHJcppva7OXADGnYQNBvITg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvddujedguddtkecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfjhgr mhgvshcuphgrlhhmvghrfdcuoehjrghmvghssegsihhosghufhdrlhhinhhkqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedtteetueevgedvhfefteekveekieejteevuefhfeelkedtfeefvdev ueefvdeiffenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpehjrghmvghssegsihhosghufhdrlhhinhhk X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 344AC51C005F; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 02:34:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-403-gbc3c488b23-fm-20210419.005-gbc3c488b Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <309acfb9-763e-4792-ab06-369c4bf458e4@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <84690bde-143b-4c7f-9a32-c445633124c0@sirjofri.de> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:34:00 +0100 From: "james palmer" To: "9front mailing list" <9front@9front.org> Content-Type: text/plain List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: open API method Subject: Re: [9front] ip/ftpd patch with tls support. Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Quoth lyndon@orthanc.ca: > sirjofri writes: > > Is ftpd with tls support the same as ftps? Then I'd really love this > > patch applied soon (but stable), it would be a better replacement for > > cifsd. That said, I can also test things out and read the code. > > No. ftps just wraps the existing FTP conctions in TLS, the same > way https wraps http. The other method is defined in RFC 4217; it > adds the AUTH TLS command which acts in a manner similar to SMTP's > STARTTLS, allowing you to upgrade the control connection from plain- > text to encrypted. > > --lyndon > this patch handles both methods of ftp with tls. - james.