From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73])
	by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90BA21656
	for <ml@inbox.vuxu.org>; Wed,  8 May 2024 16:29:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.posixcafe.org ([45.76.19.58]) by 9front; Wed May  8 10:25:24 -0400 2024
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posixcafe.org;
	s=20200506; t=1715178313;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=/CDsmPl9bphembWKwXcNxtHG4X0Oqszb1ANhWSPSxdU=;
	b=jEWkKWDGS73W6dG8uiqKtSl/8BS9YXkVesoL/0vNC4QycYnUS+Bu5BSNLj9oBdLjI+nBMU
	f0ru4XK2npUL+uUA50mqmQ8cBMT9PDI4oRoyJox836Pj9m0fVKPUqQjWtHx/cM4TGl9zQu
	iSQh6PpALLFYE6tvfoU1AnXvx6y/gss=
Received: from [192.168.168.200] (<unknown> [207.45.82.38])
	by mail.posixcafe.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id fa0e5b16 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO)
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Wed, 8 May 2024 09:25:13 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <33446f8a-20fb-46b3-8c8a-43cb29f0b44c@posixcafe.org>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 09:25:20 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: 9front@9front.org
References: <5CF629DBC32C6D8D674AE2E07A2F8289@gaff.inri.net>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Jacob Moody <moody@posixcafe.org>
In-Reply-To: <5CF629DBC32C6D8D674AE2E07A2F8289@gaff.inri.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: ActivityPub over WEB2.0 CSS-aware polling general-purpose engine-scale backend 
Subject: Re: [9front] Enabling a service
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

On 5/7/24 20:24, sl@stanleylieber.com wrote:
>> I am delighted that my bragging about playing doom 2 over drawterm
>> has become an inside joke but I must kindly petition that this be
>> upgraded to my playthrough of cavestory in nearly 1440p that I did
>> over drawterm.
> 
> what about wipeout

wipeout worked but not in as high a resolution, I like to talk about
cavestory because it was the first game I was able to map the actual
rendering in to draw(2) calls, not just internally rendering to a framebuffer
and writing that to the screen. This has some tradeoffs but it does make
playing over drawterm very nice.