From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eigenstate.org ([206.124.132.107]) by ewsd; Tue Nov 12 16:01:31 EST 2019 Received: from eigenstate.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id bae015c2; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:01:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=eigenstate.org; h= message-id:to:subject:date:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=34HekQqT5XAJ XDnVYPZNrwTH9UY=; b=lwosBFtGVr5ttDGb/iMwuI4FsXcR5xEer3YHS7iHW1PG IiCt03dm4BzhuZ9l9436uxkzAVTCIR4bgn++n9Az6GzlqUp5Znd8sCfC5RQiFH5m ZyQYv45u3PQdymwrzSrQ1M+PiIrV78IihxHsjuKjc3YHFDKy9CRpz6oVFWvlC4o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=eigenstate.org; h=message-id :to:subject:date:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=eho6qAhlhWAid90gwm2 LxbXyHC+AB3WBnCdqs7i99fcmXdnpaP4te41cdmwu5zMUk/isjZ/Gjl9OsaQz903 MfWSeINphZ6VYm/+/BK5g3FNUv3ky5LT1ZP5B2ciyj7hPAxMzvJl16DgjSHGWLm/ FRzm7mHe2Vs8zEbCbkZPnpy0= Received: from abbatoir.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (c-76-21-119-139.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.21.119.139]) by eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 42eea748 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256:NO); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:01:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <34281ACA2F3161E57FD479F8E0FA6BB5@eigenstate.org> To: rgl@antares-labs.eu, 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] thread(2): fix manpage typos Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:01:29 -0800 From: ori@eigenstate.org In-Reply-To: 3862DCD22F5F137E8809EED2DA104DEF@antares-labs.eu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: basic transactional ACPI over SSL realtime reduce/map-oriented information control > hi. > > i'm actually not that sure about the last one, but i still think it's clearer to refer to the procedure instead of a state. Yes, especially since you can't call 'closed'. Both look good to me, committed.