From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 28705 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2023 01:19:39 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 4 Oct 2023 01:19:39 -0000 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]) by 9front; Tue Oct 3 21:15:06 -0400 2023 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7221BA674 for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 21:15:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from unobe@cpan.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=message-id :to:subject:date:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=bJmK4xj5txCdagVtAEmfyRGfb 5VvgfFRpI3qH1uAOkI=; b=XZ2EQY0KuBpSEwCs2qLWnO7G9Y4CXsIlVzyFj/yaI kusbulMTfskPzcGuTBSzHAeYOHRrS9cbopHMlW0SXOzSZ138JDQZSet9lN0L8usa zGlQ7VSyRwPoe+M4gAy6NXyiqTepungVJdxHBJX1Ow5gNH7P48efYo0jbvxSom8u QA= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62251BA672 for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 21:15:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from unobe@cpan.org) Received: from strider.localdomain (unknown [75.237.252.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 227B81BA671 for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 21:15:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from unobe@cpan.org) Message-ID: <34F7A5E47A938C760E0970ED1E8FC757@smtp.pobox.com> To: 9front@9front.org Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2023 18:14:56 -0700 From: unobe@cpan.org In-Reply-To: <051BE365BDD4F4BC4AF19C6300D44B62@eigenstate.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 70674A7E-6253-11EE-9704-25B3960A682E-09620299!pb-smtp2.pobox.com List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: database general-purpose interface Subject: Re: [9front] DNS/ICMP via sshnet(4) or drawterm Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Quoth ori@eigenstate.org: > > My other major use case is ping. I see that there is such a thing as > > ping-over-tcp. I suppose one of the use cases for providing > > ping-over-tcp is seeing if packet-shaping is having an impact on a > > connection. That would suggest to me that ip/ping would be modified, > > or just a separate utility. > > > > I don't think ICMP forwarding is worth the effort; > it's ok to just not have it. Right, I wasn't thinking of ICMP forwarding proper, but from what I read online it's sending an ACK or SYN packet and measure the respones time. Maybe there's something that already does that, or it's trivial to do. Anyway, thanks again for the reply re: DNS-overTCP.