From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qk0-f181.google.com ([209.85.220.181]) by ewsd; Sun Feb 18 23:32:37 EST 2018 Received: by mail-qk0-f181.google.com with SMTP id y137so4691167qka.4 for <9front@9front.org>; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 20:32:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FQa8toPf1dP1gr2FsjcNQCZhCGlAhlmUjFBms68pu7Y=; b=RBrtWQk1P66voqdPivBxyK2FoDL1EMbBNI58DQJsA6F3NbfoF7IvC9o4op39LX1Y1j N/BJHiYw17eq/u/T/zekH4nQIG/cBi/UL7aFHbJnaLZlvLBGETpSuPw3HauHwbwM+n4u pi6FkPO14oc5H0v4tXnCyVX8oY+DZjDxN0LL57g26E9YSX39EK4BUSkg/B1xdavsybNX REDAYgTVQOHKwhMBd9hJtxgIhzeZ2m+NU0dvs/PY1KewGSNr9XAVv6oJ58mnbbXgp1Q4 QuFj89vg5uIDW//Rdffq4XQklHEdbtNnOMBJdoiDFV1Fup4iwgHNMntzFZye9WFLnaBg mKbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FQa8toPf1dP1gr2FsjcNQCZhCGlAhlmUjFBms68pu7Y=; b=RSfdH9Ewcps+PJwUPXiGIL24hiu5LBUTSDgEUCS1ntz2eKRQEJLkwnLWRG1XwZj6Hw 3lk8wIpG2Thm+/etkPFF9QljxEV7MI/H3sBh0NGfG659Nzo3RNSTcjkV3oABHpolsoxA VrTOrPLJZCv8frh6s10oLecOwwa1awmrI42s5tA3+xyeyOOdOEJrmjJsfV8HP8iU162N N7ESFQZ9CHo2KO7bTzUTblV7rZeLX+Zeuy3wtz8CJFRDiRtlAfPbhponRFdThnGYwt7U BHXy489IbWhhCGKEtOgBGCMs7Ultw4KzNrBf2Yp4G4QPaMLC11UxlxeO9pGhgteuIJkB Vy7A== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPD1Ug40cv/9or02N3QNAruumBex1YVWREyd9wcQAy+nyVvf8bCs bCwF92Xz7Kv0UsuZ0DVv47f29g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226fwts4lD9GAnBKBCHXRIJqOjGghSWvrzKv6Yw2492rFaXr5Fy+DaRyaBWqL1op6hziemZzyw== X-Received: by 10.55.115.194 with SMTP id o185mr4714073qkc.13.1519014752214; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 20:32:32 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from silverfox.localnet ([50.32.131.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v55sm72295qtc.14.2018.02.18.20.32.30 for <9front@9front.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 18 Feb 2018 20:32:31 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Veety To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] Re: TeX Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 23:32:06 -0500 Message-ID: <3587455.b62N4OQATn@silverfox> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (FreeBSD/11.1-RELEASE-p4; KDE/4.14.30; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <3BA50356-B2F3-49A7-8E72-E332C5D619EF@quintile.net> References: <3050109.x5PVi1XmgE@silverfox> <3BA50356-B2F3-49A7-8E72-E332C5D619EF@quintile.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: app-aware AJAX interface app-based solution On Sunday, February 18, 2018 12:04:13 Steve Simon wrote: > but someone did, kertex! > > > On 18 Feb 2018, at 06:55, Matthew Veety wrote: > >> On Wednesday, February 14, 2018 09:15:25 Steve Simon wrote: > >> why mot have tex(1) manpage which states that rex is not included by > >> default but gives a weblink for a recommended tex package, e.g. kertex, > >> which is tested on an9. > >> > >> this manpage would then be overwritten by the tex installation. > >> > >> everyone happy (unlikely) > >> > >> -Steve > > > > If someone makes a port for some TeX package that does this I would be > > okay > > with it. Knowing that certainly won't happen unless I do it, the > > references > > really just should be nuked. If a package doesn't ship with 9front it > > shouldn't be in they system's manpages. I mean added to the ports tree. -- Veety