From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 28247 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2021 18:12:22 -0000
Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 9 Apr 2021 18:12:22 -0000
Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]) by 1ess; Fri Apr  9 14:03:58 -0400 2021
Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0E11363C5
	for <9front@9front.org>; Fri,  9 Apr 2021 14:01:01 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from unobe@cpan.org)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=date
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:from:message-id; s=sasl;
	 bh=vMnVONjQyV3IPtAwOaNrBqP00Dg=; b=lujssmbx5Q93qw6+aOObigMs2ohf
	0uF9D5Btcu98BGk6NghjLaHugqlSspzgdkl/0b2m6wSp5JR2iIkM1rDzR9cWI63u
	WGlytz4PTWwU+yrUs8CD1u+sNx6GRCcQjtLsYi508npewMduDZLAO16r0c1aJtrb
	I3dYOrBN79YnwPI=
Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 763F91363C4
	for <9front@9front.org>; Fri,  9 Apr 2021 14:01:01 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from unobe@cpan.org)
Received: from [10.0.1.5] (unknown [47.34.135.186])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3ECB1363C0
	for <9front@9front.org>; Fri,  9 Apr 2021 14:00:58 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from unobe@cpan.org)
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 18:00:51 +0000
In-Reply-To: <5C069560FA2D542EB4ACE5B77CDDEA42@felloff.net>
References: <5C069560FA2D542EB4ACE5B77CDDEA42@felloff.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: 9front@9front.org
From: Romano <unobe@cpan.org>
Message-ID: <359EBD0C-5E86-4F5D-8271-40F007F5BDDC@cpan.org>
X-Pobox-Relay-ID:
 89BDB5A6-995D-11EB-8BD5-E43E2BB96649-09620299!pb-smtp20.pobox.com
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: template content-driven framework 
Subject: Re: [9front] [patch] nusb/ether followup to cs 8387
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk



On April 8, 2021 7:51:00 PM UTC, cinap_lenrek@felloff=2Enet wrote:
>ok, but it nusbrc can be solved much simpler:
>
>diff -r 4dfbef4fa4ac rc/bin/nusbrc
>--- a/rc/bin/nusbrc	Sat Apr 03 19:32:47 2021 +0200
>+++ b/rc/bin/nusbrc	Thu Apr 08 21:49:21 2021 +0200
>@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
> 		switch($4){
> 		case *01
> 			nusb/audio $id
>+		case ff0202
>+			# RNDIS; handled by /sys/src/9/boot/nusbrc
> 		case *02
> 			# serial and ethernet
> 			nusb/serial $id

Yes, that's better=2E

>it is not clear to me why the test -d is needed in cpurc=2E=20
>you ust want to silence the error message from cat?

Yes=2E I don't consider it an error to not have an ethernet interface at b=
oot=2E If there's no ethernet interface, $ether will be '/net/ether*' becau=
se * won't expand=2E $ether/addr will not exist, because $ether is not a di=
rectory=2E