From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, NICE_REPLY_A,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 26061 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2022 16:42:40 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 20 Aug 2022 16:42:40 -0000 Received: from mail.posixcafe.org ([45.76.19.58]) by 9front; Sat Aug 20 12:33:04 -0400 2022 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posixcafe.org; s=20200506; t=1661013180; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qzxTqHH2bpuyaO5+lAHyB3/5e/sUSIoBVh/cS3Y231s=; b=cALPJuNI0fKvYfxs30CwF8dxOfoCnNyBeFMwbODLHtYVlWNhdfbOCU87jFxTxHt501ehI/ asnsG89ZGTjFi68VP2FdWZRWRdke3HCU3+YdEWmxvxNrGhVVeF0vSB8f/YDKFxAWBn8TUv JA8FpZHMiBwhMg+FkTfQ3pouw/+BLyo= Received: from [192.168.168.200] (161-97-228-135.mynextlight.net [161.97.228.135]) by mail.posixcafe.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id d375733d (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 11:32:59 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <36ba24ed-d518-7531-004b-25b769bd0764@posixcafe.org> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 10:30:42 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Content-Language: en-US To: 9front@9front.org References: From: Jacob Moody In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: extended stateless full-stack HTML markup-oriented realtime-java-based controller Subject: Re: [9front] Cannot install 9front Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On 8/20/22 10:28, Stanley Lieber wrote: > try: > > http://fqa.9front.org/fqa9.html#9.5.2 > > sl > Since it seems it looks like something strange is going on with your ethernet card as well. There is also a *noetherprobe= that can be used to prevent the kernel from automatically enumerating the network interfaces. Perhaps it should be added to that list in the fqa as well? Thanks, moody