From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [10.1.10.1] ([104.59.85.219]) by ewsd; Thu Feb 20 09:46:02 EST 2020
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 09:45:58 -0500
In-Reply-To: <A09BF626DA8876C7BDC6AF4AA07030C1@a-b.xyz>
References: <A09BF626DA8876C7BDC6AF4AA07030C1@a-b.xyz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9front] inferno on android 9
To: 9front@9front.org
From: Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com>
Message-ID: <38432AB9-5083-4F4A-B97E-13113D6990AF@stanleylieber.com>
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: encrypted open package template-based browser framework-oriented table 

On February 20, 2020 6:44:54 AM EST, kvik@a-b=2Exyz wrote:
>> anyone else tried this?
>
>I installed it on my pocket telescreen around a year ago with
>a certain amount of matchmaking required between the apk
>and the root that would work with it=2E
>
>The main problem is wm being very awkward to use on a small
>touchscreen, unsurprisingly=2E
>
>It may be more useful as a headless integration platform but
>I haven't investigated its abilities in that regard=2E

many years ago (before dpi9k) i managed to cpu from inferno to 9front:

http://plan9=2Estanleylieber=2Ecom/inferno/img/20130426=2Epng

sl