From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 9878 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2022 06:02:31 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 16 Oct 2022 06:02:31 -0000 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]) by 9front; Sun Oct 16 02:00:53 -0400 2022 Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.riseup.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MqqH96Y8RzDsDL for <9front@9front.org>; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 06:00:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1665900048; bh=Qib3kK7otGgY40fZWRyQXlysbR7Ydxwz8GuoC2eIXlM=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=jz9j94R8k/ZmGGkRnj/PGF0dTnmdYGfjBPuWEfr+M66F6nfWgT+qRrYLgPJNuqkpS hc7j29axUTtclTuRetKEDb/Uec4Jka8lwosmvyz+jNa2S9RI0rlyv9Tq4BBMrTolio U/IpERr3EMbh2sITDGoJLFvsg5AB4PZxKA8NxaW8= X-Riseup-User-ID: 2526AD59AAD50781417B81BA0DF1280E172C91CB49983E3C5BFBED33C0DAF8B7 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4MqqH91rKbz1yBY for <9front@9front.org>; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 06:00:36 +0000 (UTC) To: 9front@9front.org References: <80981DE6-4E17-4628-B850-F67D67366D7C@musolino.id.au> From: mkf9 Message-ID: <38e50000-dfa5-d456-bec3-90f2089d797e@riseup.net> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 09:30:33 +0330 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: webscale grid-scale optimizer Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] hget: file name detection Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Alex Musolino wrote: >> It=E2=80=99s not that they file but that file you write to disk has th= e query string in the name. >=20 > Sorry. It=E2=80=99s not that they *fail* but that *the* file you write= to disk has the query string in the name. >=20 I can repro this with wget and OpenBSD ftp, maybe that's a common issue?