From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 1147 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2020 22:30:57 -0000 Received: from ewsd.inri.net (107.191.116.128) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 29 Nov 2020 22:30:57 -0000 Received: from asquith.prosimetrum.com ([125.236.209.157]) by ewsd; Sun Nov 29 17:27:00 -0500 2020 Message-ID: <390B5D322DAD6385FEA62814E629C9CD@prosimetrum.com> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 11:26:51 +1300 From: umbraticus@prosimetrum.com To: 9front@9front.org In-Reply-To: <19260358-767b-4746-a3ff-4ce456a646c5@www.fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: wrapper high-performance optimizer Subject: Re: [9front] rio: resize flash patch Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk > Specificially, it would make grepping for window names painful if > not impossible, and complexify winwatch. It would hurt the ease and > simplicity with which even new users can write scripts to start > subrios with custom labels; they could no longer `bind /dev/null > /dev/winwatch` to preserve their label. Sounds like you're confusing /dev/win^(name watch) with /dev/label. umbraticus