From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 23510 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2021 08:44:22 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 27 Jun 2021 08:44:22 -0000 Received: from 5ess.inri.net ([107.191.111.177]) by 1ess; Fri Jun 25 22:20:02 -0400 2021 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([166.175.188.0]) by 5ess; Fri Jun 25 19:11:40 -0400 2021 Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 19:11:39 -0400 From: Stanley Lieber To: 9front@9front.org In-Reply-To: References: <73a7277f-ce12-42b8-b3e3-ed86925764ca@sirjofri.de> Message-ID: <3C238F5A-DD4B-4050-998F-3545DB8670CC@stanleylieber.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: immutable pipelining base interface-based CSS proxy deep-learning manager Subject: Re: [9front] Two errors in fqa Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On June 25, 2021 6:40:44 PM EDT, kvik wrote: >The name 'docs' is unfortunate=2E >I did not (neccessarilly) hope for it to be a The Documentation thing=2E >It was primarily to be a dumping ground for articles that can't be manual= pages or aren't, under my interpretation, a fit for the FQA, or aren't /sy= s/doc-worthy (yet?) -- most people would call it a wiki=2E=2E=2E > >25 Jun 2021 23:16:38 Kurt H Maier : > >> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 12:16:22PM +0100, Stuart Morrow wrote: >>> On 25/06/2021, Kurt H Maier wrote: >>>> What is wrong with people finding the wiki, anyway? >>>=20 >>> Nothing is "wrong" with it, but it's called docs when it's really the >>> documentation equivalent of /extra=2E=C2=A0 So it's called docs and li= nked to >>> from the front page when it's really the furthest thing from *the* >>> documentation=2E >>=20 >> I don't think the intention is for that wiki to be /extra-like=2E=C2=A0= I can't >> speak for kvik but I always thought the goal was to be comprehensive=2E >>=20 >> People complained that the FQA was considered 'the' documentation when >> nobody voted for sl, now people are complaining that other efforts are >> masquerading as 'the' documentation=2E=C2=A0 Unless and until the proje= ct >> develops a watery tart to lob scimitars at people I don't see the >> advantage in promoting one best-effort documentation project over >> another, even if I happen to prefer one=2E >>=20 >> khm > maybe we could rename it to wiki? sl