From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]) by ewsd; Fri Aug 21 13:48:17 EDT 2020 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC482ED1 for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 13:48:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap35 ([10.202.2.85]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 13:48:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=8DWf0ZxBrm5CB3UF8yGUrUxB3Q40a4k OgLkeRlGEDg0=; b=W3Uov/HSMLIAJbDvct8kb9ZYAUjKdt7Ud4moa91tkUyayGg Jn8km4G0YJ80/GIX7vGufSMXvbQ6f39e8pteLzmaCAlVLZl53n2Z3El/oERmJIYg WsPnal5nLXGlK3MJp6nyhmqxaJslZSS3ZkYIDEAfGFqbD2S3RgmnhQ8Fu5OLlnq+ oluwecDJIV4geh86V5cZNOtqC6U70CqZA9Et/it8VhPYzpwQqfwJcLeoQVVpxYCC MQGm9lAVUzKIVAluTO+y0nLih0XEilQ7Ab+zXNXuvM7te/IOEx+Ru7f7UxVeR0gL KS7hSl+g+zPOioXk6hA4mO3GqZAuAmwx0hJG3Sg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=8DWf0Z xBrm5CB3UF8yGUrUxB3Q40a4kOgLkeRlGEDg0=; b=s3US6VlfdLqoETMNPISTsO GtZDVjG1VQG8Nm9L3opMuzNZ+tCqLFIuSFojauN4+d2XXB/YN+g44UILidSwS78+ K6cHRCSGp4Jkcmp27rrKoSJfgp53bbSuJcjCiHDeuh4HpqqpSc3lkxyC35jGxUFs gFEI6nqORcY6RA23ACVqYexTPwqx7TMUVEsrCQgQPRIA299OEJ6M1XxV0rrBf8Ut LEsOAdPM2ZMvFeq3rGsLCHSOf/Te2JBKUT33HHFrNWe+xNvinsfBkK0FoY3jK599 GbD5mSYmmF+u39A+vb2maZtrw5oqGJ3wL29dvPa2CovMDNNN6cMxxWOELirN/jPw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudduvddguddtjecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesth dtredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdfgthhhrghnucfirghruggvnhgvrhdfuceovggvkhgv vgehjeesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepfeelfeehjeffhe duheekgfffveelueeuheegudevudelteekgfdvieefuddtvdelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfu ihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepvggvkhgvvgehjeesfhgrshhtmh grihhlrdhfmh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 131FD14C00BC; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 13:48:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-214-g5a29d88-fm-20200818.002-g5a29d882 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <3a38e880-548f-48e0-baf8-57b45128775c@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 18:47:53 +0100 From: "Ethan Gardener" To: 9front@9front.org Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?null_email_address_question_[was:_Re:_[9front]_[ports]_updated?= =?UTF-8?Q?_zlib,_libpng,_libjpeg]?= Content-Type: text/plain List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: table hosting > NOTE: If you are using a mail server that is not RFC 2821/2822 > compliant in that it rejects or discards emails with "NULL" addresses, > you will NOT be able to complete the registration process. is there ever a legitimate use for null addresses?