From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]) by ewsd; Fri Mar 13 12:55:34 EDT 2020 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520E722683 for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:55:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap35 ([10.202.2.85]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:55:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=hWsUahziZrj7LFNAL/cwKH10zKDELEx /xSdHQjzdGCg=; b=BZBoxKRmScnJX7g9a7UzFT/bheDt8dB4o1lPtxIOEq6tCRt UITXWhp+DLs3OL0U40sQTCQZuuyub3SQLAF/M11MODuckt4oLbsUKV0UlbIw/Xnc gsGLUgkhmJToxjyywzsowVL9h6r+FdOxVnmMtVSBy4cS58+4FyAVK5OyQJbbco7p FG97UZeK2pfsXbOJ7QPD329lruALIkCkAH9NpAU07ETSrIdKQv40z8XM/rMBst9V Y6pBKg/YFwBeFwv28UUxkPbIkPLAgX8VVq9RboYxW5GG0lhHH3kNYYyK3TGfMgG8 siVTyofPh3M9n5O1C2pbphMCi8HEvsRz1hj5PCg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=hWsUah ziZrj7LFNAL/cwKH10zKDELEx/xSdHQjzdGCg=; b=crVHl4ISrwsA3WOP6baB2R kUaF4kTFkThRhNpdLIqisJNdz/S9ZyxEvjzesNdj6XwPuLfGtmT48i36l75sLWPR bA/DCL4OsXlFGAj+/1cO9q271IkYrym8FwQaNDFZq6DoXqemMd/8SzyNw9Xp22kV gIy82LNUyKzLGM0bAxPhKyiiNC19hNqz2Egv86MmsY2wtP2gyhDdDfTRRPLbn/bQ +p76AQX7IcmIeI5AEFam3Kro1lPVMQqLUBCmex0YOlAGM137nwuiQrQsIj7hxYMA JxKVqky89Tl1DGzpDCA7bZrdYBEqDRWcUuMPekdUNG12s6+V7+3GcjVEXBGl2r7Q == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedruddvjedgleegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfgfhthhgrnhcuifgrrhguvghnvghrfdcuoegvvghkvggv heejsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrfhhmqeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedunecurfgrrh grmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegvvghkvggvheejsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrfhhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0EC7D14C0336; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:55:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-991-g5a577d3-fmstable-20200305v3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <3a9787aa-4b57-4b39-bc92-8344fdd3972a@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <528d3ca3-2d46-77a8-a367-ffac684bd88c@qs.co.nz> References: <528d3ca3-2d46-77a8-a367-ffac684bd88c@qs.co.nz> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:55:11 +0000 From: "Ethan Gardener" To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] Bug in time cmd? Content-Type: text/plain List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: proxy strategy On Tue, Mar 10, 2020, at 11:39 PM, Trevor Higgins wrote: > Doing some timing tests with mk I got these sort of figures? > > 14.28u 6.14s 5.92r > > From my *nix understanding the 'u' time is way off. Actual elapsed time > was approx 6seconds. Haha! I wonder, could it be counting CPU time per core?