From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from duke.felloff.net ([216.126.196.34]) by ur; Mon Dec 12 11:32:48 EST 2016
Message-ID: <3b7a1d9fe2cf4e5383a75b243c420c09@felloff.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 17:32:40 +0100
From: cinap_lenrek@felloff.net
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject: Re: [9front] New Balanced Search Tree Implementation
In-Reply-To: <CAAsuYKcYzjJErRggg4qTRWO9A6WoubvoP1SF35idN9q2V3ep_Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: package full-stack layer 

> You can also try it with LLRB but all of my tests have shown that LLRB
> is almost always slower than AVL.

Then why even implement it then when its always slower than avl?
you could get rid of the indirection...

--
cinap