From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from orthanc.ca ([208.79.93.154]) by ewsd; Wed Jun 26 22:29:08 EDT 2019 Received: from orthanc.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orthanc.ca (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 1e354217; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 19:29:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Lyndon Nerenberg To: 9front@9front.org, Stanley Lieber Subject: Re: [9front] 9FRONT RETURNS TO PRINT WITH STUNNING NINE VOLUME SERIES In-reply-to: References: <5dba54dc-a392-4b97-a028-3bdc0fb04d5f@Spark> <8db9ec20-9b2f-4a1c-b69a-95ea8cef8acb@Spark> <40c8b4feab4afe76@orthanc.ca> Comments: In-reply-to Stanley Lieber message dated "Wed, 26 Jun 2019 20:59:40 -0400." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <73704.1561602547.1@orthanc.ca> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 19:29:07 -0700 Message-ID: <40c8b54ff2011e64@orthanc.ca> List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: extensible extension markup storage-based API Seriously, though, a copyright suit needs to show actual loss of income. There's no chance in hell that any entity-of-the-week that purports to own any 1990s UNIX IP could claim a loss from anybody reprinting a bunch of papers that never were marketed for sale. Okay, there were the 9th and 10th edition manuals. You, me, and maybe 200 others bought copies. They have been out of print for decades. No loss of income could ever be imputed. --lyndon