From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mimir.eigenstate.org ([206.124.132.107]) by ewsd; Thu Feb 6 02:04:58 EST 2020 Received: from abbatoir.fios-router.home (pool-162-83-132-245.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [162.83.132.245]) by mimir.eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 6d9150b0 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256:NO); Wed, 5 Feb 2020 23:04:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <41C1C224799A4773531D38B6A58B78E5@eigenstate.org> To: knusbaum@sdf.org, kokamoto@hera.eonet.ne.jp, 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] Netsurf 3.9 for Plan 9 (work in progress) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 23:04:48 -0800 From: ori@eigenstate.org In-Reply-To: <955870EE382B37038C6DC9E0099709AD@sdf.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: progressive flexible CSS-based HTML over XML hosting CSS hypervisor > Yes! I've just applied my changes and have it compiling and loading web pages. > I've just taken the git/diff and dumped it. (That's attached) So, looking over the changes again -- I have 2 questions: 1) Is the hlcache api a better fit for webfs than llcache? 2) Is caching something we should push down to webfs?