From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]) by ewsd; Sun Feb 24 14:21:55 EST 2019 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CECE6220DA for <9front@9front.org>; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 14:21:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap2 ([10.202.2.52]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 24 Feb 2019 14:21:52 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to:subject :content-type; s=fm2; bh=n8Wv4zEUmjzd9GVga4Z9HDM8awOGB4Jmn8VKwBq qmfQ=; b=tb3vzmTQn14dT02LOXGznMtzmfjeKLnwFt1v1luRmeDaKa4VXL2VXI1 tjCmoFHM2GfJgrK8zvlZisy1BTC2BSNGN4FrbgmcBbNIqVpuGu3vGQ9NFxUYrjXm jYBRta7Ur3K7Q2RPleCGrAXEMj9bQ9FJ5Y6lttIC3Z3ahdfxZr+iKqdZHqUm5mKB rQEblP0uf/nzw3kRh5e9hSpfMtPaMKbFmGw4J4+eA2dr6B3BasEJAdeDCYtO2wls QiA3vR99U/9bZrAyKNTsh+4S2wwAGNCxIPZucJlytbvmXqh5d7V6p2rA+wUxnRRC hBQDeF992uabiPcnQ/a4zzQkwnk18Kw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=n8Wv4zEUmjzd9GVga 4Z9HDM8awOGB4Jmn8VKwBqqmfQ=; b=C1G1chnR3PtmCU7n8JOklKBqam0BPDLEM rINsr0mnjYInQVKvGhIMGoWT+vcTUEuXFGe5l1jJdtHgjk8JxLCB5GoooQgVgJff EpOLO9EEzIvaYN0ol8pQjjB8t4TqHFl/9AOO1eov3cs1T/lAGtaAWQQXQW3OkxE2 FjqAbszfgYjQ2ZHj8gKCsf14z0270SsSCPq0/oN8NSOtYAJLSXNZ0tDYre3KA1wY nDTmyrLfOfdOuXruwKrHb8dcSRlPcnGV4jPAwZZcOJH+A5iQHJjdvtkphgOG2Kn7 Na+W1p2SJjBlbBARLxsdK4nlOorg3Glu2eYY2cWJiPJAis08WHqUA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrudeggdduvdegucdltddurdegtdelrddttd dmucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfquhht necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfgfhthhgrnhcuifgrrhguvghnvghrfdcuoegvvghkvggv heejsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrfhhmqeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepvggvkh gvvgehjeesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 90C537C1EB; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 14:21:52 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.5-895-g0d23ba6-fmstable-20190213v1 X-Me-Personality: 1990148 Message-Id: <46441610-9bcf-4a73-b306-f25349ef172c@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1c66-5c713580-7-3eadd7c0@253752096> Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 14:21:48 -0500 From: "Ethan Gardener" To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] Re: [9front] Drawterm on Void Linux Content-Type: text/plain List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: leveraged element plugin On Sun, Feb 24, 2019, at 6:27 AM, hiro wrote: > just suggested it cause i guess void linux is doing it wrong, and that > might be the right way to fix it on their side. Years ago, it seemed to be the normal way to select which device node was the CD-ROM, etc. It made some sense to do it that way, using common tools and recording the choice right there in /dev, but I guess it's no good when nodes get renumbered.