From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 20984 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2022 23:11:07 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 18 Aug 2022 23:11:07 -0000 Received: from gaff.inri.net ([168.235.71.243]) by 9front; Thu Aug 18 19:09:44 -0400 2022 Received: from smtpclient.apple ([166.175.191.212]) by gaff; Thu Aug 18 19:09:44 -0400 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Stanley Lieber Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Message-Id: <487BFCCD-9DF3-4C93-B648-DB77B3D36710@stanleylieber.com> References: In-Reply-To: To: 9front@9front.org Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 19:09:43 -0400 X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19G71) List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: decentralized overflow-preventing proxy-based controller Subject: Re: [9front] hackathon writeup Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk please elaborate. this is your chance. sl > On Aug 18, 2022, at 6:53 PM, Stuart Morrow wrote= : >=20 > =EF=BB=BF >>=20 >> As expected, there was pontificating about the next version of 9p, >> and how to make it handle latency better. Ideas were floated and >> rejected, and the difficulties were explored. While no solid >> conclusions were reached, there are a few things we know are >> essential to the making the next version better. >=20 > Every time I see this discussed, I never see 9P.ix (code is in branch > NxM of harvey-os) mentioned (either as something to adopt or with > a reason why not to adopt). Just saying... >=20