From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 20877 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2023 11:29:37 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 27 Oct 2023 11:29:37 -0000
Received: from mx0.riseup.net ([198.252.153.6]) by 9front; Fri Oct 27 07:28:15 -0400 2023
Received: from fews02-sea.riseup.net (fews02-sea-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.112])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mx0.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SH0lT39DXz9sy1
	for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:28:05 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
	t=1698406085; bh=NEdU84AkkOtD23rcnVCz6Wzp7favCcXxYJ+UBOUmK8g=;
	h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
	b=Kya41Cft3HC0AxC14wxk0tfTWILDZp2jmEFIJVXyygqgvTrYQ91Q68dqeziGggJSv
	 aknq6kznRFyZg/FIsEBJ836cAJGk3Pvs1Jy6ReGnJ40pfFA98sDHeIdPzSc3cTyAD7
	 pzUqooY+IIXiJYiHJoj/gWXJTe+dcnOCopN8/V1k=
X-Riseup-User-ID: 4ADD01C5F3A1818C32A6AD215F191B288E5300FEDCC4FE67F5B88926D1952582
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	 by fews02-sea.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4SH0lS5F69zFpbp
	for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:28:04 +0000 (UTC)
To: 9front@9front.org
References: <0BF086A514DDC564F68D9C0A7862D9C3@smtp.pobox.com>
From: mkf9 <mkf9@riseup.net>
Message-ID: <49aaea24-8647-783f-1e9f-48b94ede4957@riseup.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 14:58:01 +0330
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0BF086A514DDC564F68D9C0A7862D9C3@smtp.pobox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: HTTP framework rails 
Subject: Re: [9front] DNS/ICMP via sshnet(4) or drawterm
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

unobe@cpan.org wrote:
> Quoth ori@eigenstate.org:
>> if the goal is dns, it may be better to simply make us
>> fall back to dns-over-tcp.
> 
> Thanks for pointing that out, Ori. I didn't know about dns-over-tcp;
> I never had to do a request that required it, apparently.  That would
> entail modifying ndb/dns*, yeah?
I'm not sure if clients need change, but we have a ndb/dnstcp server 
that seems to work.