From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 12903 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2021 22:22:17 -0000 Received: from 4ess.inri.net (216.126.196.42) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 18 Nov 2021 22:22:17 -0000 Received: from balrog.mythic-beasts.com ([46.235.227.24]) by 4ess; Thu Nov 18 17:13:27 -0500 2021 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quintile.net; s=mythic-beasts-k1; h=To:Date:From:Subject; bh=CGz0Gv3vdN/qy+o0c6Yq2fzeow5apRuoy+sgWk1Jqkc=; b=IHidr7x3iCR8xge5gAQT4NPo7G fL+d5dtVAlPwMpn3j4AUF42Jn6uNZF/OJGRl7XKYcCcOfiTJ8ZhxMHqgpICeW0G0JM3+G7XVqf+6l AfkC8L8HaQjp7vzAGzzgu8nVKms3seQ0qGYa/MlYduzEkj6gzAOBzjLlGp6B9vl86x7MsGZUAFI04 MrrS7mRWlL1FZztQ4Bla4qF57v4rnHm517dDxitruQm7n6QJWtbHqIaFRU+0xxZpktnVRIkQy7VYO Aqrukp/wJxdCD++3jfKCCi7vVx/X5fOJgSnJV2jR2Ge6Wh2oIT45wr61PcrwPOqbTwe21hIpn7d+Y s7hS4yZw==; Received: from [81.187.198.132] (port=54365 helo=smtpclient.apple) by balrog.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1mnpWn-0002tE-Kf for 9front@9front.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 22:05:13 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Apple-Notify-Thread: NO X-Universally-Unique-Identifier: 743AD136-C725-4C60-8C6E-3BD48224FAC1 From: Steve Simon In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 22:05:08 +0000 X-Apple-Message-Smime-Encrypt: NO Message-Id: <4A0B108C-C61D-48F4-9550-6394823096F1@quintile.net> References: To: 9front@9front.org X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18H107) X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 4 List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: descriptor AJAX over ORM general-purpose property database Subject: Re: [9front] cfs, aan and network recommendations Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk i am interested, where is the readahead? in cwfs, in the 9p kernel? in page(= 1)? -Steve On 18 Nov 2021, at 10:12 am, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: =EF=BB=BF >=20 > However, when reading static files like pdfs and images (big filesize to > protocol ratio) it's really a benefit. >=20 i doubt that, we have readahead, so unless you're bandwidth limited the 9p latency shouldn't matter. that is when the mountpoint that supplies the file is cwfs and it didn't get re-exported by something else...