From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 14553 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2021 19:47:33 -0000 Received: from 4ess.inri.net (216.126.196.42) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 2 Nov 2021 19:47:33 -0000 Received: from mimir.eigenstate.org ([206.124.132.107]) by 4ess; Tue Nov 2 12:57:56 -0400 2021 Received: from abbatoir.myfiosgateway.com (pool-74-108-56-225.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [74.108.56.225]) by mimir.eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 037c5178 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256:NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Tue, 2 Nov 2021 09:57:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4EBE77893E9CE3937BDC099792A210A9@eigenstate.org> To: 9front@9front.org Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 12:57:15 -0400 From: ori@eigenstate.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: secure engine firewall-aware session session control Subject: Re: [9front] man du -s correction diff Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Quoth Humm : > Quoth Kyle Milz: > >the description in the manual for du -s looks just plain wrong. > >by itself du -s only prints values for the top level. > > The top level being each `file` argument, and the values being gotten > by descending the hierarchy as always. > > -- > Humm > I agree that the current phrasing is a bit confusing. What about "for each file" => "for each argument"?