From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ds.inri.net ([107.191.103.21]) by ur; Wed Feb 10 16:06:51 EST 2016 Received: from ghost.inri ([107.191.103.21]) by ds; Wed Feb 10 16:06:48 EST 2016 Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:06:39 -0500 From: sl@stanleylieber.com To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] syslog(2) change Message-ID: <4b69a6e5a9cac5df34f7112f58749050@ghost.attlocal.net> In-Reply-To: References: <1270b9585a3e327733049d87e8a08103@utsuho.znet> <50a1e90923c69e7c710766ab431c23a8@utsuho.znet> <1455120937435-0fca18ba-a33032ef-afc32a2e@stanleylieber.com> <68c8b9c471a28126f0ca4ddfb1f8f034@utsuho.znet> <5b700121babb21f8e721550f9815085f@ghost.attlocal.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: standard-based API standard > I'm in favour of putting timezones in log files. I know it may seem > pedantic, but imagine a program parsing log files that needs to convert > into unix timestamp. It seems silly to require such a program to be > able to map hosts to timezones. Adding a timezone identifier to log > files seems like a trivial change that would remove any ambiguity about > the exact UTC time of a log entry. Wait, this approaches a rationale. sl