From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 6250 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2023 22:05:35 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 23 Oct 2023 22:05:35 -0000
Received: from mars.pulpie.xyz ([104.238.162.80]) by 9front; Mon Oct 23 18:04:35 -0400 2023
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcp80.org; s=20211202;
	t=1698098670;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=qGiOnLtbhnOAiPVyX5imTqj/p7N01Md/5S+2mEeWwmQ=;
	b=aK4/5BuHxsOjSQtjbw5EQ38jU7dDTpKCeFIEF1zqX6ssehSFByCi3gZ99G2aG+mCDQHbPt
	tZH/kUusXAds0n6gfgJgvITayzEjH5DBX0NmgIDfW1tymHcCB3xXCZboBFbcPvBjZPYnw+
	EukQYGP/wNVpWtgJMTLYzA6W7V6ft4k=
Received: from [10.0.2.2] (deimos.pulpie.xyz [172.16.32.2])
	by mars.pulpie.xyz (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 7aee4964 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO)
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Mon, 23 Oct 2023 17:04:30 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4ca40378-935e-4d03-875e-36cf8fb9fb46@tcp80.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 17:04:28 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: 9front@9front.org
References: <5f50281a-73d8-470f-b629-b691068f10b2@invalid.invalid>
 <9d000483-bac2-4716-8658-c566cccade2b@posixcafe.org>
 <88d0f7d1-6607-4486-b829-cbf98ae9dfb8@invalid.invalid>
From: "B. Atticus Grobe" <grobe0ba@tcp80.org>
In-Reply-To: <88d0f7d1-6607-4486-b829-cbf98ae9dfb8@invalid.invalid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: private plugin dependency just-in-time map/reduce solution 
Subject: Re: [9front] Libaml does not recognize opcode 0x86
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

On 10/23/23 16:48, Blue-Maned_Hawk wrote:
> On 10/23/23 17:14, Jacob Moody wrote:
>> On 10/23/23 16:05, Blue-Maned_Hawk wrote:
>>> Libaml does not recognize opcode 0x86.
>>
>> What is the context here? What are you trying to do?
>>
> My machine's battery is not detected by aux/acpi, meaning that 
> /dev/battery never shows up, meaning that neither bar nor stats can show 
> what is a critical piece of information.

what machine? model number? manufacturer? the output of sysinfo as run 
by the hostowner?

you've provided no actionable information whatsoever. if you're going to 
make a bug report, include the above information as well as any error 
messages and contextual information in the first place so people don't 
have to waste their time playing twenty questions.