From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <9front-bounces@9front.inri.net> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from 9front.inri.net (9front.inri.net [168.235.81.73]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6AE241D3 for ; Fri, 3 May 2024 21:53:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.posixcafe.org ([45.76.19.58]) by 9front; Fri May 3 15:51:39 -0400 2024 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posixcafe.org; s=20200506; t=1714765890; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TDvRJep5vaILXTtFQR0tzsRReQ8gT64br9cm5KAUbeE=; b=t2Ps4j6POg+q49YH14T/UoD3v8Z5Vf4NQl5JZc5uSdORfCyISbiD4sxad7nvtW7WVJFV5a QnplPkcwtvFkg04gNYiEYD3wd/rHmBl32YbG1o4LP4OqPWzva8L6rK7Podql8IqZh2JgrR h3aEJH4w0g7rb69xgKpxr9AWX4T0QJM= Received: from [192.168.168.200] ( [207.45.82.38]) by mail.posixcafe.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 26b9fff8 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Fri, 3 May 2024 14:51:30 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4f9bde56-04c9-4ded-b7c1-1eac44b81198@posixcafe.org> Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 14:51:33 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: 9front@9front.org References: Content-Language: en-US From: Jacob Moody In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: anonymous wrapper extension Subject: Re: [9front] AUTHENTICATE failed can't get challenge (imap4d) Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On 5/3/24 13:23, sirjofri wrote: > 03.05.2024 14:12:18 Alex Musolino : > >>> Does someone know what could cause this? >> >> Is your server hosted with vultr? > > Nope, netcup. It's the cheapest plan there, but I never had issues so far. > > sirjofri We've seen it happen to folks primarily in vultr but I don't think there is currently any reason to believe vultr specifically is a target. Getting a list of every machine with ports open on the ipv4 net these days is really not much of a task, so I wouldn't be surprised if they were just spamming any address they know of listening on web ports. Either way, I'd update your kernel and userspace and see if that fixes the problem. Thanks, moody