From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.236.95.4 with SMTP id o4csp99920yhf; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:22:17 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <9front+bncCJWI_KeUFxC56dqABRoEBoD0vA@googlegroups.com> Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCJWI_KeUFxC56dqABRoEBoD0vA@googlegroups.com designates 10.52.155.207 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.52.155.207 Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCJWI_KeUFxC56dqABRoEBoD0vA@googlegroups.com designates 10.52.155.207 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=9front+bncCJWI_KeUFxC56dqABRoEBoD0vA@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=9front+bncCJWI_KeUFxC56dqABRoEBoD0vA@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.52.155.207]) by 10.52.155.207 with SMTP id vy15mr4660852vdb.13.1343665337272 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:22:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:message-id:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=N8r1U9ZNdVDj50ig2q6TI3I7OT3Rt8hO2dwML/eFEl0=; b=PZCK9EeGCFr2t7eWQPktqKw/VCNXKvU9ZN/jYysHOQcW1ZQwfZeG0wJ+Lv5R+Dfu2J Bwbop47iSFSSCBJ31IosDkevkhLUvqZBB1IvWyX/4Q6QI2Z9Mza4qwZq+F3kUtcIC0+X nt2MsgR4Ub/dHtk11oIZ/dov88L6ybYHZTNGs= Received: by 10.52.155.207 with SMTP id vy15mr1047592vdb.13.1343665337009; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:22:17 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: 9front@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.52.100.135 with SMTP id ey7ls3761584vdb.6.gmail; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:22:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.75.161 with SMTP id d1mr15791900vdw.2.1343665336578; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:22:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.75.161 with SMTP id d1mr15791899vdw.2.1343665336568; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:22:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vb0-f46.google.com (mail-vb0-f46.google.com [209.85.212.46]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m9si1456129vdg.3.2012.07.30.09.22.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:22:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mveety@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.46 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.46; Received: by vbbff1 with SMTP id ff1so5535367vbb.33 for <9front@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:22:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.88.234 with SMTP id bj10mr10263374vdb.48.1343665336426; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:22:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blackfox.local (plns-64-111-157-196-pppoe.dsl.plns.epix.net. [64.111.157.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k4sm9836848vdi.6.2012.07.30.09.22.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5016B4B8.3040608@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:22:16 -0400 From: Matthew Veety User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 9front@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Installing 9front References: In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: mveety@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mveety@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.46 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mveety@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: 9front@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list 9front@googlegroups.com; contact 9front+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: <9front.googlegroups.com> X-Google-Group-Id: 831096995978 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: 9front@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 7/30/12 7:09 AM, Uriel wrote: > 3) Not only are the disk space requirements are somewhat high, but you > get no warning if your disk is too small, you go all the way into > copydist, which barfs on disk full errors, but 'completes' anyway and > pretends it is done and that you can go on with the next install step. > > At the very least we should warn if the disk is too small, and > probably we should fail before going into copydist. I agree with you here, an option to use kfs would be awesome, especially because cwfs is overkill for non-fileserver cases. Also, I think work should be done to make cwfs a little more versatile when it comes to disk size. -- Veety