9front - general discussion about 9front
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Romano <unobe@cpan.org>
To: 9front@9front.org,cinap_lenrek@felloff.net
Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] ssh.c algorithm negotiation + ssh-dss key exchange
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 00:18:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5197783A-91DD-40F7-AAAC-97D58E6DAA6D@cpan.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46EAF705F4A303B4565307D8950670A3@felloff.net>

Thanks Cinap!

We discussed a bit on irc, but wanted to thank you again for your feedback.  RFC8709 is now published for ssh-ed25519. My comment was indicating that while 3des-cbc is required, I haven't seen it supported. And I meant to imply chacha20-poly1305 as the stronger algorithm implied by the RFC.


On June 12, 2020 10:58:41 PM UTC, cinap_lenrek@felloff.net wrote:
>no. we'r not going to bring back dsa from the grave.
>
>are you sure rsync.net does not support rsa keys?
>
>they give an example on ther website how to generate a keypair
>using 4096-bit rsa as an example:
>
>https://rsync.net/resources/howto/ssh_keys.html
>
>introducing edwards-curve support should go into libsec,
>and we'd need to add factotum support.
>
>this stuff is fun, but tricky to get right.
>
>we already implemented edwards curves for dp9ik using libmp,
>the reason i havnt added edwards curve support for tls is
>that the intrgration is quite a bit tricky and the standard
>was still in draft at the time.
>
>on the code, it adds quite alot of lines. i hate pointer
>typedefs and i dont like the introduction of global "pub"
>variable. and all these if(strcmp())'s.
>
>also there are some misleading comments:
>
>+	/*
>+	'At some future time, it is expected that another algorithm, one with
>better
>+	strength, will become so prevalent and ubiquitous that the use of
>+	"3des-cbc" will be deprecated by another STANDARDS ACTION.' - RFC4253
>+	No standards action has yet deprecated it, but have not seen it
>supported
>+	by default in any server.
>+	*/
>+	algsp->cipher = "chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com";
>
>what is that supposed to mean? what has 3des todo with
>chacha20-poly1305?
>
>are you trying to indicate that the IETF is going to deprecate it?
>
>--
>cinap


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-13  0:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-12 20:35 Romano
2020-06-12 22:58 ` [9front] " cinap_lenrek
2020-06-13  0:18   ` Romano [this message]
2020-06-13  8:38     ` hiro
2020-06-13 16:32       ` Romano
2020-06-13 16:39       ` ori
2020-06-13 16:46         ` Romano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5197783A-91DD-40F7-AAAC-97D58E6DAA6D@cpan.org \
    --to=unobe@cpan.org \
    --cc=9front@9front.org \
    --cc=cinap_lenrek@felloff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).