From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from a-painless.mh.aa.net.uk ([81.187.30.51]) by ur; Fri Jan 19 10:53:28 EST 2018 Received: from 10.190.187.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.187.190.10] helo=quintile.net) by a-painless.mh.aa.net.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ecYyd-0003zt-5A for 9front@9front.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:53:11 +0000 Message-ID: <545680f7b9b9a1e8458f08e51f902574@quintile.net> From: "Steve Simon" Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:53:07 +0000 To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] plumb rules for page In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: private component The effect is useful. if you plumb multiple images (e.g. from nedmail) then they appear in a single instance of page as different pages withing page (if you get my meaning). merging multiple PDFs could get confusing, and having multiple page instances each containing just one image could be frustrating. it is non-othogonal but feels ok (to me) in reality. -Steve