From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mta01.eonet.ne.jp ([203.140.81.44]) by ur; Tue May 10 20:31:50 EDT 2016
Received: from mars.jitaku.localdomain (101-141-39-171f1.osk3.eonet.ne.jp [101.141.39.171])
	by mailmsa11.mozu.eo.k-opti.ad.jp  with ESMTP id u4B0VjaD021234
	for <9front@9front.org>; Wed, 11 May 2016 09:31:46 +0900
To: 9front@9front.org
Subject:  Re: [9front] Fu ....
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 09:31:45 +0900
From: kokamoto@hera.eonet.ne.jp
Message-ID: <54e3a46bc06ee2017aa6d15641ab2332@mars.jitaku.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <057bc0f981366204a12e6de9598edeb0@titan.jitaku.localdomain>
References: <f5d738da31bac2f1536ad3eefe10a9b4@felloff.net>
	<057bc0f981366204a12e6de9598edeb0@titan.jitaku.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: hardware hypervisor STM descriptor 

> It was because I did not compile sl's nupas for 386.

I was confused last night, because much tired to
update my 9front system.

After good sleep, I rechecked the situation, and found
I got compiled sl's nupas for 386, not amd64.
For amd64, old binaries (eric's nupas made usable on
9front  by myself) were copied to the system.

I should do debug the reason, as notified by cinap.
Today, I still have duty(I'm half retired), and will do it
after that.

Kenji