From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 19197 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2023 03:34:35 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 24 Oct 2023 03:34:35 -0000 Received: from mail-pg1-f180.google.com ([209.85.215.180]) by 9front; Mon Oct 23 23:32:28 -0400 2023 Received: by mail-pg1-f180.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-577fff1cae6so2719370a12.1 for <9front@9front.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 20:32:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698118346; x=1698723146; darn=9front.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:references :to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ats+HQUvbutaj4HrDY9UnIAGBZJu0Z7A9eFg6LIvPYs=; b=VLX9Jg3PF9QZ0tncU91JSoi81RrY4+ErV8ZM+qWOSmT/OIrf76YrV4Nk/nqrVRS+QW 4wwizzezVJKzXMeYa62SPJENNBabeszDQHObhY9EkTUCSb3CQ/c/XhSEekM2RklPAEPM pspm+07jo2MCcLYf51NsT4fAmPyIVG8O44hDdpyWMrwdbesjL/BUq7EqS8QXF9oCpegx qVEDQszB1DQ/8mGs9Ar1xSIgNC55i9E3cu8MonihP0v3LPw1K6FaFCjPuojBPT2JCZQV qGd3+MuFEEJAK8ToelaQvSPIpIUSm+5JyosdKuqYryQlyLO2Ws05oBFVWyhiDyi+hZfh vhKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698118346; x=1698723146; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:references :to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Ats+HQUvbutaj4HrDY9UnIAGBZJu0Z7A9eFg6LIvPYs=; b=A0WnTT6UCzQJcyrC2lqrMFr85PQPpFQKDY1/wunnvVMIrzADzo1udBLNU0cBaU8Eip G4+ybSboOir2wJ03SXT5Nvvw9O3Xx4YkfP8FRZUIKPNwBvGZ6/sw6cO2kgKPYa3VehJ7 X+lwmL65nlGnClMs+uF6VNzkQUk6hSK0B7R8VDYJ4aoqogZ1x+FmpsZ0e1mIaNoGSkm0 yp2JReNTEwkRaw7ivori4oovEKr+wtFbJ9uEIa7F3W2KqR4SkTyzEkiJFEJQCUaMq3nf VbkB7fKgPkEexeCUyc+FTsxpm2gNrPEQ11af/auhi4Grj0piFMUSP2OEYJX2cRe+tcff i8Qw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwpsBS89G/C0nDuMWfoCab5MCnBj5bz8I1DazOyRh6KpaWagQPj gdLLbRGLh/AJl7xxs9daJu2Ar2x5OaOk0g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IENavPIK71e089EoqooAmk8ywcynfjYYe8HJHVgFRGcEXtW56tx3tzTAK5O/Y1llwoIenTL4A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f685:b0:1c7:7c2c:f828 with SMTP id l5-20020a170902f68500b001c77c2cf828mr15004600plg.8.1698118345874; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 20:32:25 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPV6:2600:1700:e4c0:9ea0::441? ([2600:1700:e4c0:9ea0::441]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jj11-20020a170903048b00b001c8a0879805sm6707281plb.206.2023.10.23.20.32.23 for <9front@9front.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Oct 2023 20:32:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Blue-Maned_Hawk X-Google-Original-From: Blue-Maned_Hawk Message-ID: <553d4b18-df20-45d6-b8ce-b9bd4f6b4320@invalid.invalid> Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 23:32:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: 9front@9front.org References: <3bebe4bc-1f84-41f6-9de1-29612cd2d0d1@invalid.invalid> <7AE634EE-CDF1-4EDA-A363-ED088326CF78@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: asynchronous STM-oriented wrapper just-in-time rails dependency backend Subject: Re: [9front] Libaml does not recognize opcode 0x86 Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On 10/23/23 23:18, Kurt H Maier wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 11:00:33PM -0400, Blue-Maned_Hawk wrote: >> Okay: it prevents batteries from being recognized as existing. Works that >> for you? > > No. Include a link to sysinfo output from the affected machine. > I seen't how that justifies of the problem itself caring, of which to which your statement in reference to was. >> I seen't what info'd be necessary. Please clarify. > > Your English is as bad as your problem-solving capacity. > If you, as an english speaker, can parse that sentence, it is a valid english sentence. Back on topic, that does not clarify. >> That accusation of theft seems to me completely out of left field. Where on >> earth did you get it from? > > If only more people would ask you questions like that; whoever > orignially bought that computer might still have it. Ah, i see what you're trying to do there now. You're not going to succeed in it.