From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mimir.eigenstate.org ([206.124.132.107]) by ewsd; Mon Feb 10 15:04:22 EST 2020 Received: from stockyard.bk.recurse-network.net (gateway.bk.recurse-network.net [185.230.222.2]) by mimir.eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 562237e2 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256:NO); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:03:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5E1C7897AE724746621B184092C13D6C@eigenstate.org> To: jamos@oboj.net, 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] Suggested patch to libjpeg in ports (jconfig.h) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:03:38 -0800 From: ori@eigenstate.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: basic high-performance storage standard > Dear list, > > Netsurf is able to view JPEG if linked > against libjpeg in /sys/ports. However, > it includes the file that > is present in the ports 'files' directory, > but which for some reason is not installed > by default by ape-libs/libjpeg/files/mkfile. > Copying the file manually to /sys/include/ape > makes netsurf happy, and being able to show > jpeg images. > > Am I right by copying the file? It seem that > maybe it would be a too obvious thing to leave > out, unless using jconfig.h is a special case > (I have not dug very deeply in libjpeg to be > honest). > > I've attached a patch (generated with "hg diff") > in case this would be the right thing to do. > If not, it would be interesting to know more. > > Best, > Jonas Looks sane to me; committing.