From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 4364 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2022 03:43:49 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 27 Aug 2022 03:43:49 -0000
Received: from mimir.eigenstate.org ([206.124.132.107]) by 9front; Fri Aug 26 23:40:52 -0400 2022
Received: from abbatoir.myfiosgateway.com (pool-74-108-56-137.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [74.108.56.137])
	by mimir.eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 0ad74eeb (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256:NO)
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Fri, 26 Aug 2022 20:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <6096F7A2A4FAE4D19DAB0F94D4F28672@eigenstate.org>
To: 9front@9front.org
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 23:40:38 -0400
From: ori@eigenstate.org
In-Reply-To: <CABB-WO9dEVJS8F08h7HMmhAjmqwpOZwJReS_t=5g+4cVffzyHg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: open-source basic template XMPP base CSS-aware layer 
Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] programmable menus for rio
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

Quoth Stuart Morrow <morrow.stuart@gmail.com>:
> 
> I don't get why kbdtap is in rio rather than kbdfs.

It needed to be somewhere, and rio is somewhere.

There are some advantages to putting it in rio, there
are some advantages to putting it in kbdfs, but in the
end, the interface seems to be exactly what is needed,
and if there's a clear advantage it can be moved with
no change in interface. And the interface being right
is the most important thing, since it admits a number
of implementations.

If you feel strongly about moving it out of rio, I
think it'd be possible to send moody a patch along
with a strong argument to move it.