From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from b-painless.mh.aa.net.uk ([81.187.30.52]) by ewsd; Wed Dec 11 07:23:24 EST 2019 Received: from 132.198.187.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.187.198.132] helo=quintile.net) by b-painless.mh.aa.net.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1if11B-0007cv-DZ for 9front@9front.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:23:01 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.37] ([81.187.198.132]) by quintile.net; Wed Dec 11 12:23:00 GMT 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Steve Simon Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [9front] upas ntlm auth -- untested, unused? Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:22:59 +0000 Message-Id: <62CC98B0-80D2-4DC8-ADB4-27C45E29AF8E@quintile.net> References: In-Reply-To: To: 9front@9front.org X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17B111) List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: polling XMPP descriptor app i wrote the ntlm code for webfs but i cannot remember if i pirted it to imap= too. i used imap onto exchange for many years and that might have needed it so it= might have been me (if noone else claims it). if it is my code then its untested on 9front rather than untested at all - i= used the labs code at that time. -Steve > On 11 Dec 2019, at 7:29 am, ori@eigenstate.org wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFThe upas ntlm auth code has a comment claiming it's untested. > I don't have an imap server that does ntlm. Is anyone is using > the upas ntlm auth? Does anyone have access to an imap server > that does ntlm? >=20 > I'd like to remove either the code or the comment.