From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by ewsd; Sat Sep 28 14:11:44 EDT 2019 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1818421B6B for <9front@9front.org>; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 14:11:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap36 ([10.202.2.86]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 28 Sep 2019 14:11:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=au3PJqLx7UXJ7lucXsGbmYwEczRd8E2 4hrMBXhnR0s4=; b=nXBzWHoOVmy/9KFbQb/FGsjBE+aiY8G95wVcZ/7SkaFoG/6 Pyhkv6IU3zlgr9Eahdvsqf/WhUgIz4oZBSTjxxepI87+mojlsVe317OcdmfaMW0t 99Yi9wFFbLcT7pekZDEx8VibRHN3AvEVmMXCgtwgo+v7Q2FMY/+JbwyLZRdecmaA 4Ly8fmWyL2Bzw/lLUKKhg1zvze2or7AQ2SE9eKLEvWmdDmTbEYfYjaL+iJ85R3I2 VfnLkt0woXS5qWVl8W2Ki6rc2s1NLiT3KKr1Ee72S+NjTNxEcqQp31CtBVFSU9qy Gdeb9EEYCibURsW8WdetzopFnWIhStMUyySX+eA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=au3PJq Lx7UXJ7lucXsGbmYwEczRd8E24hrMBXhnR0s4=; b=p3YynpVFb/XHjxSI27v7t7 i/RvWjJEJ+DpsWqKvHHqgBUFNjnw25d1QsXdm132McjklOrw4khD0xrcQxsc73eC jN2/yn2sa6xJduSBXA2X99urTr39zAdAHxyv0YmLtB1kckj1wYxtLknNIRkZpM9l TDepwrM0KHgzyDMuBHffwrvj/24L0WisPmekIWUQOjV7Nu4Bi/S+dtNQeeyeBd1z X3ZOqhDB1VhnpET6gnmbhsYbWjC5d7aKMbugu4qVGaG3A3tqknyaKomMEBCZ7fmC +dD3Vo5Zthhl9SpkZ9GgqkTMWs8o0lJa4M959z+uDBo4DOUswfKRD6k8c7poCk9g == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrfeekgdduvdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfgfhthhgrnhcuifgrrhguvghnvghrfdcuoegvvghkvggv heejsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrfhhmqeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepvggvkh gvvgehjeesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id B16A9188005C; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 14:11:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-305-g4111847-fmstable-20190924v1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <648bc1dd-cf80-43c2-91e8-d76e127a075f@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 19:11:19 +0100 From: "Ethan Gardener" To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] Quick PRNG question Content-Type: text/plain List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: agile markup hypervisor Thanks, both of you. Sorry for list noise, not sure how I sent it to the wrong address. On Tue, Sep 24, 2019, at 10:45 AM, Julius Schmidt wrote: > Look up xorshift and its variants > > It's about a million times simpler than Mersenne twister and some of > the variants are much better at passing statistical tests. > > On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, Ethan Gardener wrote: > > > Hi Aiju! I remember some time back you laughed at Mersenne twister PRNG, citing another PRNG as simpler and better. What was the better PRNG? > > >