From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]) by ewsd; Mon Nov 23 18:17:27 -0500 2020 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897A619C7 for <9front@9front.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:17:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap35 ([10.202.2.85]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:17:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=YnyBnfTiHf3K1/6xA6G/QxRf+9De0Oj 642yFHWbcMkg=; b=LJ8+rmlyMLw8jZjoXleZEGBbYOTKN/uLs68Lw8xRHNn5pI+ pRpNchQ/S28rn0WxmFoyI8Z59vfmWCD5HeecX+l4ErsKxNxuudl8C6U6tGPDGLMZ xNSCET0hFHB8isClw4wkks+A/H/Qaln7YBKiy/VJKJ8uTDuypFwywkac6gG+d93B ZB/k6nRXHSYiHwMhdybQGlCK/b3+8R7NWe2g8SaxAHcxIhS641L0poXWZ1vixBZ9 WXHV3GcNURamg3M3eQc4eAdJgpkK5Uf1u51Pd4zE4D7vZTDobCJRzVJ+FjlfkGE+ WbAljr7G5w6xKQg3iJ9y1zBfxIGdy25eH5WrVCg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=YnyBnf TiHf3K1/6xA6G/QxRf+9De0Oj642yFHWbcMkg=; b=jI4A4oYcCgYF1dcGqeIcbe UM16J0/IgsBsVp2aWPzpAY7EDKVKh4HMCg/7VuokzZlnipBax08aitZkxvYNnzMQ qk+ZYcjXd8Nc5mJwfqvSpMAv613cf0HBKAB6YdN7p7fIZ6aEZzgskOQBV7t2XEyf 7OZcoeBUU+2UP6SPvfiib3V6bpuneJIQZclVUpICvVfGmWHtDGuB2KmLS9pqwYho O5rrCxX0J//tpSYu2MJethxvp8s3rRf91obD6zhEXUBRq0zOumHEb7TfpcclDRce ERnasp97h8a1vIW2FetI7EN113wdVWkK3/z8dqJmjQHqq4rcj0rMtze01G2J8c4A == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudegjedgfeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfgfhthhgrnhcuifgrrhguvghnvghrfdcuoegvvghkvggv heejsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrfhhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeffvddtheegkeeffe fgueefjedutedvgffgffekgfejhfetkeegveejvdefueeuieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhi iigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegvvghkvggvheejsehfrghsthhmrg hilhdrfhhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id B8BCE14C009C; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:17:24 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-622-g4a97c0b-fm-20201115.001-g4a97c0b3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <686b2ed6-1ffb-4a0f-b3be-f198a69c17c7@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 23:17:05 +0000 From: "Ethan Gardener" To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] rio: resize flash patch Content-Type: text/plain List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: cache-scale high-performance-scale base-scale generator On Mon, Nov 23, 2020, at 10:06 PM, Amavect wrote: > On 11/23/2020 3:16 PM, Ethan Gardener wrote: > > I'm curious, where are you seeing the flash? I remember it from when I first started using Plan 9, but a patch to speed up the vesa driver made it too fast to see. This was all before 9front. I think I've seen it with 9front too, but can't remember where. > > > > (I have no problem with the patch. I always thought the needless redraw a bit of a waste even if it didn't matter to me.) > > > > I see it in a drawterm to a local VM. It doesn't show every time I > resize a program, but it occurs about half the time. > It's much more noticeable in a connection to a remote cpu server. > If you wish to simulate the experience, add a sleep call right after the > flushimage call. Oh yeah, remote would show it. Thanks!