From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 16288 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2021 17:54:40 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 1 Jun 2021 17:54:40 -0000 Received: from 149.28.13.84 ([149.28.13.84]) by 1ess; Tue Jun 1 13:24:24 -0400 2021 Message-ID: <68C2D709B94513F227A4C2B56EDF6FF9@fulton.software> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: 9front@9front.org Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 08:09:18 -0700 From: fulton@fulton.software In-Reply-To: <1C4DE32C373501A487F0F5F1AD185B49@felloff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: non-blocking singleton callback solution Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] sha3 but fixed the code style Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Quoth cinap_lenrek@felloff.net: > i do not like b[200] aliasing bstate here. i think it would be better to > handle this explicitely in the code. Why? -- Fulton fulton.software!fulton