From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 3614 invoked from network); 27 Oct 2022 18:15:07 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 27 Oct 2022 18:15:07 -0000
Received: from gaff.inri.net ([168.235.71.243]) by 9front; Thu Oct 27 14:13:31 -0400 2022
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([104.59.85.219]) by gaff; Thu Oct 27 14:13:31 -0400 2022
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Message-Id: <68C45E59-7FF7-43E2-9554-9C945A5C7CF8@stanleylieber.com>
References: <66468897021357DAE5B6C96FA41C7780@prosimetrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <66468897021357DAE5B6C96FA41C7780@prosimetrum.com>
To: 9front@9front.org
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 14:13:30 -0400
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19H12)
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: event replication-aware HTML over YAML self-signing dependency locator 
Subject: Re: [9front] 9front-8963.f84cf1e60427675514fb056cc1723e45da01e043.amd64.iso vs thinkpad x61t
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

yeah, it was discussed. i thought an argument for the target location might b=
e sufficient, but [reasons]. in the end we settled for documenting the proce=
ss in the fqa.

sl


> On Oct 27, 2022, at 12:59 PM, umbraticus@prosimetrum.com wrote:
>=20
> =EF=BB=BF
>>=20
>> [reason unknown]
>> ...
>> my own highly specific script, which is inadequate for general use
>=20
> Reason discovered. We don't know where everyone's kernels belong.
> Mine need to be on 9fat on the cpu and /shr/<some string>/ on the
> machine I am typing from. How do you script that generally?
>=20
> umbraticus
>=20