From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 17676 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2022 18:27:31 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 1 Jun 2022 18:27:31 -0000 Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 9front; Wed Jun 1 14:25:52 -0400 2022 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sciops.net; s=20210706; t=1654107948; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=e+FU0ugIygQaiP91PPxSPRzNIv3fEG5lfsk7O1VDr9g=; b=ct0qOEhIbLxA5MRZiEAgzDBfuk/m/9xhEjtQ4/XoHB+PLF0irr1KtZZZAJbh1QFmZ8GuEy 0dZSPUv8JPA0uezCmC2Ziy2WfR2fLoTyNAUI4GpFTtmWlmGzOfa3f2bwGiDFjRbmjuWGyM 5LIkz462qnfHNKIPlUL2nAw3CN3gP28= Received: by wopr.sciops.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a7561346 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Wed, 1 Jun 2022 11:25:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <69522EFD7B56668C792D3AE6303A7ED6@wopr.sciops.net> Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2022 20:25:45 +0200 From: qwx@sciops.net To: 9front@9front.org In-Reply-To: <1891A6A1667D3B01C161961BB4CC8736@prosimetrum.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: base markup optimizer Subject: Re: [9front] rio autosize on null sweep Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On Wed Jun 1 12:17:35 +0200 2022, umbraticus@prosimetrum.com wrote: > I tend to stack my rio windows. If you do too you may > enjoy the patch below, which takes some inspiration > from sam and interprets a bad sweep (in practice, a > click instead of a sweep) as a request for dimensions > equal to the those of either the window clicked on or > else the whole screen. You can still cancel a sweep > with b1 or b2. Perhaps there's a cleverer > pseudo-tiling thing that could be hooked in here but > this was good enough for my use. > > umbraticus Nice, thanks :) Cheers, qwx