Fu ....

Fu ....

[kokamoto]

At last, I came up with recent 9front status...
many small or big not insignificant changes were made
during these 3 months.

I'm still using eric's upas system, which becomes a bit
hard to compile because of change of regexp library.

I like eric's upas by two reasons:
1) can remove many spam files at onc action.
2) individual files are stored separately.

The 9front's upas can do those?

Kenji

Re: [9front] Fu ....

[Travis Moore]

I think sl may have fixed his version at:

http://plan9.stanleylieber.com/src/nupas.tgz

haven't got around to updating and trying it yet.

Re: [9front] Fu ....

[kokamoto]

Thanks!
I hget the file, and compiled it on my 9front system.
Yes, it compliles very smooth, and I'm now writing this
mail by that commands.

May this mail reach the site...

Kenji

Re: [9front] Fu ....

[Travis Moore]

glad to hear it works.

Re: [9front] Fu ....

[kokamoto]

> glad to hear it works.

But, It suicided after sending that mail.
I'll see it later.

Kenji

Re: [9front] Fu ....

[kokamoto]

> But, It suicided after sending that mail.
> I'll see it later.

??
when I send it from drawterm, it did not suicide...

Kenji

Re: [9front] Fu ....

[kokamoto]

> when I send it from drawterm, it did not suicide...

test again from a terminal.

Kenji

Re: [9front] Fu ....

[cinap_lenrek]

use snap(4) and make a process snapshot. then
try to make a stack trace in acid like:

term% acid <pid>
acid: lstk()

--
cinap

Re: [9front] Fu ....

[kokamoto]

Thanks.

It was because I did not compile sl's nupas for 386.

The terminal used 386 mode this time, and drawterm used
cpu server(running amd64 mode), and right nupas.
Therefore, nupas wored fine from thje drawterm.

Sorry, my easy miss.
I compled the nupas also for 386 objtype.

Thank you sl! for your work.

Kenji

Re: [9front] Fu ....

[kokamoto]

> It was because I did not compile sl's nupas for 386.

I was confused last night, because much tired to
update my 9front system.

After good sleep, I rechecked the situation, and found
I got compiled sl's nupas for 386, not amd64.
For amd64, old binaries (eric's nupas made usable on
9front  by myself) were copied to the system.

I should do debug the reason, as notified by cinap.
Today, I still have duty(I'm half retired), and will do it
after that.

Kenji

Re: [9front] Fu ....

[stanley lieber]

The following should build on 9front (any arch):

        http://9front.org/extra/nupas.tgz

sl

Re: [9front] Fu ....

[kokamoto]

> The following should build on 9front (any arch):
> 
>         http://9front.org/extra/nupas.tgz

Thanks.
I checked this, and found the problem at calling sanembmsg() in fs/mbox.c
where you wrote it has problem in pop.

Now, I just commented out it, and now works fine like this.

Kenji