From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 11982 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2023 15:21:44 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 22 Jul 2023 15:21:44 -0000
Received: from wopr.sciops.net ([216.126.196.60]) by 9front; Sat Jul 22 11:20:34 -0400 2023
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sciops.net; s=20210706;
	t=1690038825;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:  in-reply-to:in-reply-to;
	bh=upcQiuak2JzEHNphN8tCsLptD+I1T93RIJi2nWHcuok=;
	b=yKxwQ2F4Zw1eficYvDUpeMF/bZNWxBnbhCO7A9BN50+38Rk91tI+75R/pLb8gfAd1C0fS3
	AYHD4WejxPb4lNa7ccurFEayufBo43Eqr0dcfFObaNIo1vmkBaJ+9N7ALMV3VqGiRECLo2
	h61LnhjcniZi3RONnp13FN71GLBarf0=
Received: 
	by wopr.sciops.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 58c26fd2 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:256:NO)
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Sat, 22 Jul 2023 08:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <6A18535D2E91EC21922F41C918A8222C@wopr.sciops.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2023 17:13:50 +0200
From: qwx@sciops.net
To: 9front@9front.org
In-Reply-To: <026861bc-64bb-aafb-5613-0510420f8d35@posixcafe.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: ISO-certified stable lifecycle blockchain-oriented generator 
Subject: Re: [9front] Invitation for testing a new game for 9front: Jetpack Game
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat Jul 22 16:14:36 +0200 2023, moody@mail.posixcafe.org wrote:
> On 7/22/23 08:31, Csepp wrote:
> > https://limited.systems/articles/climate-cost-of-ai-revolution/
> 
> Indeed, there are also unanswered questions regarding the legal
> owner of intellectual property of code like this. It is impossible
> for us to verify that this code is respecting the license of the
> code that influenced it.
> 
> As the kids say:
> "this is a no from me chief"
> 
> Thanks,
> Moody

It doesn't work anyway.  It has multiple bugs, and makes several
bizarre choices that don't make any sense.  It literally has output
typical "I have no idea what I'm doing" copypasta.  Event code might
be common enough that it copies the overall structure in a sort of
plausible way, but it gets wrong anything more technical such as
timing and blocking i/o.  It doesn't quite follow style(6) either.
Chatgpt's entire goal is to output plausible looking answers, not
exact or correct.  Therefore I think that this is a pointless
exercise; you cannot trust it and must review and correct all of its
mistakes anyway.  If you want to learn to program 9front software, do
that instead of trusting some language model.  My 2¢.

Cheers,
qwx