From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	NICE_REPLY_A autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 20424 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2022 17:40:34 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 11 Nov 2022 17:40:34 -0000
Received: from mail.posixcafe.org ([45.76.19.58]) by 9front; Fri Nov 11 12:39:38 -0500 2022
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=posixcafe.org;
	s=20200506; t=1668188501;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=0xDY+b7tFXrwaqj8i3sDkB6bfUXjZh5v3+QZBFuhKOM=;
	b=PIueA0vi3H8xkuCtCzMtMwbO5TuF2EBI23PDAuw+wKTiwg33y7lKS99j0aELNdmJTseY5z
	yWgGUPIOIF3/VWzamTs80/BpD9u0a8VY4IrtwJsIdZvqPKZXOOlXJgGCMyQEDn5kCZv1r3
	0kpCy9PRKO3qNLaJpQXgqpozREJkkJg=
Received: from [192.168.168.200] (161-97-205-25.mynextlight.net [161.97.205.25])
	by mail.posixcafe.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id f7e97e96 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO)
	for <9front@9front.org>;
	Fri, 11 Nov 2022 11:41:41 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <6c58605e-7b25-1adc-3681-41df77e4ae91@posixcafe.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:37:20 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.4.2
Content-Language: en-US
To: 9front@9front.org
References: <2110680159.4595621.1668187065209@comcenter.netcologne.de>
From: Jacob Moody <moody@mail.posixcafe.org>
In-Reply-To: <2110680159.4595621.1668187065209@comcenter.netcologne.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: basic table-aware shader factory 
Subject: Re: [9front] [patch] skelfs: remove useless code
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

On 11/11/22 10:17, Arne Meyer wrote:
> Hello,
>   
> if I read the code correctly emalloc9p already checks for failed allocations and zeroes the memory, so the following code is redundant.
> 
> Greetings,
> Arne

You are correct, muscle memory did not work in my favor this time.

Thanks!
moody