From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 21220 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2023 14:14:36 -0000 Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 6 Sep 2023 14:14:36 -0000 Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]) by 9front; Wed Sep 6 10:13:14 -0400 2023 Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:dmadhatr@sverige.sdf.org [205.166.94.6]) by mx.sdf.org (8.16.1/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 386ECrW7017181 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO) for <9front@9front.org>; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 14:13:01 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sdf.org; s=sdf.org; t=1694009581; bh=2pK7SuJqni/7r+IqvDK6sP1xeKhOW5dPh3o2wICbjzk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=AM9m9yNfu3HD9JGr8nfUTVUeWWEo4TOrf7ye1KaV0Qdhe9Uy8YHV76XVIhJVgGJdF RPWOxPcpDavcQIOpRMRIdqFLTMwySazGE0FrbjsRWomPhCn8/DE1Gk3yF3mhqSTnk1 r/X4rxyvpkgANPMTh/Anr0O/aH0crYNG/ZNhHGlY= Received: from localhost (dmadhatr@localhost) by sdf.org (8.16.1/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id 386ECqqI001680 for <9front@9front.org>; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 14:12:52 GMT Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 14:12:52 +0000 (UTC) From: Dmad To: 9front@9front.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <70bc4a01-9ed6-21cf-e4db-bf36f59861db@sdf.org> References: <5120126d-b136-fe80-0b6f-c3c62a946b30@sdf.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: agile virtual browser CSS TOR over SSL content-driven just-in-time locator Subject: Re: [9front] MP4/VP9, SSH & TLS Bounty Numbers and Progress Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk Copy, I should have said I would cover the increase/bounty - but I figured that was implied, but then again, written lanuguage isn't always as expressive we'd like it to be. Thanks for clarification on the TLS/Deadbeats issue - and the dead beats issue in general, this really helped me understand the situation(s). Appreciate your response. On Wed, 6 Sep 2023, Lucas Francesco wrote: > Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 10:59:33 -0300 > From: Lucas Francesco > Reply-To: 9front@9front.org > To: 9front@9front.org > Subject: Re: [9front] MP4/VP9, SSH & TLS Bounty Numbers and Progress > > Hey, just wanna tip out some of them MIGHT be outdated, like the > MP4/VP9 one. We have a vpx/h264/av1 decoder/encoder working and that's > stated there, but I'm almost sure the request was for an inhouse > library (and that's why the bounty is still there even though we can > decode, play and encode video) and another caveat on that one is that > I'm almost sure the person that put that bounty there is dead. > > > I know there's still people wanting a proper inhouse ssh server since > people were using a hacky one written in go, but you're reading the > TLS part wrong: it's already done and it's missing on payments, > anything below the "DONE (pay up, deadbeats) " part is stuff that we > already have but the person that put the bounty there either didn't > pay or did not update us about the bounty being already paid, this is > due to the bounty board being 100% put up by people on ml/irc saying > they want stuff and the fact that 9front.org "itself" does not hold > the money to pay up the bounty. > > As for increasing the bounties, this is all a community effort, 9front > isn't funded by anyone besides our time and money and the general > community wisdom nowadays is that increasing them isn't making people > do it, and bounties aren't enforced by 9front so any way this might > happen is convincing people that putting more money on the line is > worthwhile. > > On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 09:42, Dmad wrote: >> >> Greetings, >> >> Was reading through Plan9 Haters late last night and saw the bounties >> printed there. Are those bounties still outstanding (just saw the printed >> ones are nearly identical to https://fqa.9front.org/appendixb.html)? >> >> I'm not a C programmer, but a SOC guy - however, thinking that a little >> more sauce on the kitty (increasing the bounties) may be beneficial. >> >> Those are the three I am interested in - let me know if there is something >> more pressing for the project that needs focus. >> >> Thanks! >> >> dmadhatr@sdf.org >> SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.org > dmadhatr@sdf.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.org