From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from duke.felloff.net ([216.126.196.34]) by ewsd; Sat Nov 21 08:05:16 -0500 2020 Message-ID: <74FAB0A857B5C9B0248420FE1D2E93EA@felloff.net> Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:05:04 +0100 From: cinap_lenrek@felloff.net To: 9front@9front.org Subject: Re: [9front] efi loader disk order In-Reply-To: <20201120132506.tfkboyyqr265qylh@wololo.home.arpa> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: transactional social TOR information session manager yeah, that seems to be a reasonable solution to support multiple 9front installations per disk in uefi. the old logic is mainly historical, because in bios, all we got was the disk number where the boot sector came from. then we just look for any 9fat. i'm fine with this modification. could you also provide a patch to the manpage to document the behavior? -- cinap