From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eigenstate.org ([206.124.132.107]) by ewsd; Fri Nov 22 16:24:05 EST 2019
Received: from eigenstate.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id f7a0e1a7;
	Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:24:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=eigenstate.org; h=
	message-id:to:subject:date:from:in-reply-to:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=L2mcu7V/MiIq
	bVHeNHl+4YW2Yfw=; b=B4QQszw8qYNAo9WqJTBYqntxUKbQOJuyCHdHfFUAnIN8
	6lNAoJk9hEPoCH28ehZJXvjZ6eU7hp/S4cr7rZJ62xLgAXzmedSa3KcGsnj/MxHm
	AgfcmGgBDaqNJcuMGRtT6s9NMD3uE22lshjnW62y3e2lbBVZTVXi1km6hpAXEmc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=eigenstate.org; h=message-id
	:to:subject:date:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=ClRMNK6HulnuOLSz9ma
	JRs917yzOn7glzEjESZDYBG15loHM8yGPH+cC7SCDtiaUkmhpL1mZHZCD8onohb/
	uxpCvuUS5QT83MilyjvwNsm6UyDEmhkdJ8Y8qfdK7GdVw/m8mWDcvEo4SNuEwd+7
	7sL8e5p7PAhWzkqWRDgrxPHQ=
Received: from abbatoir.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (c-76-21-119-139.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.21.119.139])
	by eigenstate.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 82b40cc1 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256:NO);
	Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:24:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <7A2D1BB6FE9C23694C9D0285618FF979@eigenstate.org>
To: cinap_lenrek@felloff.net, 9front@9front.org
Subject: Re: [9front] fix ref822
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:24:03 -0800
From: ori@eigenstate.org
In-Reply-To: BD20254A4D44CDBA3E45CBF7D9595D10@felloff.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: virtualized ISO-certified property shader table 


> you can see that when there are no duplicates, that is, when
> you remove the uniq() functions, they'r both identical
> expressions.

Yeah. There's potential for being some elements short
in the old code because the last uniq may remove something.
So, this change is better.