From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.236.50.47 with SMTP id y35csp255084yhb; Tue, 8 May 2012 10:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: <9front+bncCP2Z1en5GxDNvKX9BBoEZtYb8Q@googlegroups.com> Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCP2Z1en5GxDNvKX9BBoEZtYb8Q@googlegroups.com designates 10.68.216.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.216.42; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9front+bncCP2Z1en5GxDNvKX9BBoEZtYb8Q@googlegroups.com designates 10.68.216.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=9front+bncCP2Z1en5GxDNvKX9BBoEZtYb8Q@googlegroups.com; dkim=pass header.i=9front+bncCP2Z1en5GxDNvKX9BBoEZtYb8Q@googlegroups.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.216.42]) by 10.68.216.42 with SMTP id on10mr73166pbc.3.1336499789428 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 08 May 2012 10:56:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:mime-version:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :x-http-useragent:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5DG46l0CpRZ0hHYqT4gf3r7N/jaBD9QS74UG2Konmxc=; b=IlyX0sMCZrhElb6ZSPpeSh6VPd4/3ZNtzkLp6cEZ230WwKn3PtrN2dw0odPgJTrcNP NH3BDLqc6o2feyfIG9VLjWMyGgSkbZiv9GjEj4HwtQ8/0PRKwCwg/rAvxPgtpw4pUfWL njuyNAZR3f0bmE1uf8Pz9RRdZEwvl1kiu1eKc= Received: by 10.68.216.42 with SMTP id on10mr8748pbc.3.1336499789345; Tue, 08 May 2012 10:56:29 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: 9front@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.68.195.100 with SMTP id id4ls91236pbc.8.gmail; Tue, 08 May 2012 10:56:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.203.226 with SMTP id kt2mr7924pbc.6.1336499788843; Tue, 08 May 2012 10:56:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by h10g2000pbi.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Tue, 8 May 2012 10:56:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 10:56:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux i686; U; en) Presto/2.10.229 Version/11.62,gzip(gfe) Message-ID: <7aa15ef5-85aa-4021-957c-aec99af937dd@h10g2000pbi.googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: /dev/wsys/*/screen not present for nested rio? From: vrtra <9@vrtra.net> To: 9front <9front@googlegroups.com> X-Original-Sender: 9@vrtra.net X-Original-Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9@vrtra.net designates internal as permitted sender) smtp.mail=9@vrtra.net; dkim=pass header.i=@vrtra.net Reply-To: 9front@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list 9front@googlegroups.com; contact 9front+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: <9front.googlegroups.com> X-Google-Group-Id: 831096995978 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: 9front@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ... snip... > it seemed as if /dev/wsys/2/ itself likely did not exist. Had you > really started two windows already within the nested rio? yes, I did, I also tried with the exact steps you mention below without creating extra windows. > This is what happens on my system: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 term% file /dev/wsys/1/screen > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 /dev/wsys/1/screen: plan 9 image, depth 32 This works, Now, following your procedure, I start rio in the same terminal. Then open a terminal and type file /dev/wsys/1/screen > And from within a nested rio: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 term% file /dev/wsys/1/screen > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 /dev/wsys/1/screen: plan 9 image, depth 32 Here I get /dev/wsys/1/screen does not exist. If I type ls /dev/wsys then it shows /dev/wsys/1 (Also this commit went in, that does not expose the screen any more in nested rios.) http://code.google.com/p/plan9front/source/detail?r=3D20799ee25a269b545712c= b45220a9b94eba04c24