From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 5078 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2020 18:45:10 -0000 Received: from ewsd.inri.net (107.191.116.128) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 30 Nov 2020 18:45:10 -0000 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]) by ewsd; Mon Nov 30 13:40:55 -0500 2020 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE61F8E for <9front@9front.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:40:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap35 ([10.202.2.85]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:40:53 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=sQ2P0oQoRACo+9WbvqQTGxxK4HuyJv8 1d6qQrZPlsd0=; b=SCruLTT7p5TwI66cLZamptEfmS3a/X1NsN1NnJmcQRjw7yD wi6AntHMnNoSKpPlBsJU/a//ps3jkdWHkqcTf1fk/B/GYlRRXcM2cc8MZFKdbsO7 PW2CAbNb9UqhjczSHmLQZY+EqxTHiZF91UbeADlepYd9ZHnrsCZxaJenVBqV1LGq K7yFSNq5bz9sWXhzgPGN3JQZTLzXTdiN7LnM9ddT4ntS7931gvHi+oqh4Yy06+Ie osg392qEjlCYThmbFX+1LlP99V6BCgLZ/J28sCRYXf+REhu342NMLFdozAHbrbeb d1Kb3vBapeuGgbxNW6BrozYrpNAn/yIbQE8T6DQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=sQ2P0o QoRACo+9WbvqQTGxxK4HuyJv81d6qQrZPlsd0=; b=QFMSyoUpvRdrQnCU4aH23A WqLNKljNMxGxluJTVTjVunHcSUXC7JT903NXiA0Zh20LOAgX2WUYC469zPF/aUB4 cZAGCLq5cXgO+900Ije8N5AoaJOxaa+5S/guf04x0zcF7SAAgNtGVeAUc5uJHLWt aVQ6E22krqxHwNaY7JcsB1CilAMSSHvc5iSAL2ERc52jjD7jJ4iPXNAGDj6fY6DO C4ukVjMYybRS0W1eUTjmt3lpMKOAw7BWL50AOjYzs9nrsFf3RvnREICYuFxHiCPk yoKkOHAIa1mTyqJZKu7A2KrgCX0b34oIayYKoT01xjHBhLSgRxJbnZhrWnqP79iA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudeitddguddugecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesth dtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdfgthhhrghnucfirghruggvnhgvrhdfuceovggvkhgv vgehjeesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdhfmheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffdvtdehgeekfe efgfeufeejudetvdfggfffkefgjefhteekgeevjedvfeeuueeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfu ihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepvggvkhgvvgehjeesfhgrshhtmh grihhlrdhfmh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 68F2114C0331; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:40:52 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-622-g4a97c0b-fm-20201115.001-g4a97c0b3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <7b639e82-1c04-4651-884c-bb52377aea0d@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:40:32 +0000 From: "Ethan Gardener" To: 9front@9front.org Content-Type: text/plain List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: stateless browser injection-oriented injection manager Subject: Re: [9front] /dev/draw performance Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, Nov 30, 2020, at 8:03 AM, Steve Simon wrote: > > I am not saying rio cannot be improved, but characterising it as > inferior work by inferior people is (i feel) unfair and incorrect. I realise my statements could be read that way. I intended to mean people with different goals, but regardless, I'm sorry to those involved. Anthony is also correct. It's a bad habit I got into a long time ago and can't seem to quit, especially where Plan 9 is involved. I entirely missed learning about Brazil when Stanley Lieber and others were no doubt researching it.