From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 15567 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2023 17:34:03 -0000
Received: from 9front.inri.net (168.235.81.73)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 26 Nov 2023 17:34:03 -0000
Received: from mail-oi1-f172.google.com ([209.85.167.172]) by 9front; Sun Nov 26 12:31:57 -0500 2023
Received: by mail-oi1-f172.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3b842c1511fso2243901b6e.1
        for <9front@9front.org>; Sun, 26 Nov 2023 09:31:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1701019914; x=1701624714; darn=9front.org;
        h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:references
         :to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:from:to:cc
         :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=eCEQBlF1G42po+yRUQ2hCH9vo2pinvXTxm3SHIwNbNU=;
        b=LSmIZ+r1bBDhskf9EnkwtueXoORr11JZswjoKtUor5JS9oEfURhp2RC+trNgnVJswR
         ZqgUVXcbMk3N3uYLQQyvmLwjUSA8FRlaGLtq0ScgEtpB7CcG2Xljzlt8AjpaWLqfHbD3
         H7Ji3BA4eJnI3JcWQpPMASgv6NMDAr/2ql7lFnM6so1iok6unjVLxj/3qO9bggPbOwIB
         6uQBMuLaRey2nkGjHzEbuYdIljiwarkeFfPumDJNmHraMvgWR93w+p87Q5kxjTHAN/fv
         c8kKj4oafa0wHMy1N9cWQVIDOLooQ54prA5q3yK038dcRHaN3rIAdF4atcBUjxukwOt3
         fUEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1701019914; x=1701624714;
        h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:references
         :to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from
         :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=eCEQBlF1G42po+yRUQ2hCH9vo2pinvXTxm3SHIwNbNU=;
        b=eWRo46aNlwbXPiIJLuDwNjrIhFV+lZANordxNFgldjn1RDe4sMw7/hRVnvU9rsNDnT
         Gwq4jtPN7tYxTrWAPNo+SPo5ZI5wZ0fNuezILM32EPtVxl48F034fKy+zQyWEYR+YUi7
         r7B+rBnepK56yfVdIG6ZjuH6E35SzLqBZuUDcc7hR31mrBTu+CPa1BdLEWzUZ95kmsOJ
         79hPYNaYAjHVj09MlglE2BgnkAB5OVt0sPCjf4JluiXSUaBJAx6JpsbsDM8g6hqkWryr
         jaHIu1UHxuv3kPyQNIWAIm1TpOpW35CIGoBv8wZRM6usVUHiu2UM+BwwDpu3mMUh4EiC
         /Dww==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YykW6plh3xppjk0ikaG8wjItLaMFUqieWGUgmfoF9EuMsq+cbDb
	N9bsybvs3Xg7+j6u9kJ/R/Ww54FFm6ghmw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEg8NP8zgfJghA/TwKOLq5SXHVWtUM3baL55QSR3r2NhYYw0/l9vbKGEqZUzVWEruzwdpQMJQ==
X-Received: by 2002:aca:d11:0:b0:3b2:e536:a442 with SMTP id 17-20020aca0d11000000b003b2e536a442mr9909592oin.16.1701019914031;
        Sun, 26 Nov 2023 09:31:54 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <bluemanedhawk@gmail.com>
Received: from ?IPV6:2600:1700:e4c0:9ea0::5f6? ([2600:1700:e4c0:9ea0::5f6])
        by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t34-20020a05680815a200b003a40b3fce01sm1214277oiw.10.2023.11.26.09.31.53
        for <9front@9front.org>
        (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Sun, 26 Nov 2023 09:31:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluemanedhawk@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluemanedhawk@invalid.invalid>
Message-ID: <7c509994-3425-4dd8-b633-4836a85a5839@invalid.invalid>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 12:31:52 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: 9front@9front.org
References: <ZWJBI-xTsSAQAVF0@wopr>
 <9968586B-D663-4350-A1C2-DC7801182998@quintile.net>
 <CAEoi9W5PMU4wnA=8LgD=hq+JYGftsA83gjSgTFysgJxnD7axjQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZWKr_zDsVVVddLrz@wopr>
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <ZWKr_zDsVVVddLrz@wopr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-ID: <9front.9front.org>
List-Help: <http://lists.9front.org>
X-Glyph: ➈
X-Bullshit: structured out-scaling manager 
Subject: Re: [9front] [PATCH] Fix assert macro to not break on commas
Reply-To: 9front@9front.org
Precedence: bulk

On 11/25/23 21:22, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> Doing fancy shit with macros in places where you have the opportunity
> not to do fancy shit with macros is bad.

This change is not fancy.  It's the bare minimum for things like this.

> Finally,I'm doubly suspicious of it because the submitter has a history
> of asshattery and obnoxious behavior in the irc channel.  If this patch
> came from some drive-by rando I'd be less opposed to it; instead it
> comes from someone with a recent history of willfully refusing to
> communicate clearly, and is defended by someone who chose to support it
> based on sophistry instead of any clear technical grounds.

I'm just new around here.