From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.3 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 10717 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2021 23:42:16 -0000 Received: from 1ess.inri.net (216.126.196.35) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 21 Feb 2021 23:42:16 -0000 Received: from out1.migadu.com ([91.121.223.63]) by 1ess; Sun Feb 21 18:35:12 -0500 2021 Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 16:06:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pixelhero.dev; s=key1; t=1613950503; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AxNNw7HEnJXgAkqs8YVHr248dYpvZkM55ABaZnbuyAY=; b=Zc1R1xUA5GLARn8pw8dQ4Eb6Oo8NcGzvJRwR9qGz0Li0DvYmo3czhCBGyY8vOYFf5oPvQb AWPMxeRsYky0MgLugMTLbdzpHDP5KNBWUw3bVY5uE38zP02HrskLtaOKFvUhrIrKG/vnrZ ypWpFqSFapUO5AWAyKOEHl0qPIJDz/WBrXuI5uxahkK6/W/ZXSa+K/S2EwdaBj6oxorJdv OM4Pmw93IpPfm7DG9k2ej6/1Eckg0w899dsNVV9cEhCLQ3YZ/fqO7+lMlirBqQtKJI4ZpA TYDcyhdyLRvZqC2x3BpZTUGe4edsbkStvyfjU3YiF2/TmgCePe+gfSWP6H3KSQ== X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Noam Preil To: 9front@9front.org Message-ID: <82c9d5ad-8764-476e-9676-5e4c4d509293@pixelhero.dev> In-Reply-To: <91D3FF1D1C092D773820E38BA6D98CEF@felloff.net> References: <91D3FF1D1C092D773820E38BA6D98CEF@felloff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Correlation-ID: <82c9d5ad-8764-476e-9676-5e4c4d509293@pixelhero.dev> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: noam@pixelhero.dev List-ID: <9front.9front.org> List-Help: X-Glyph: ➈ X-Bullshit: extensible replication-oriented manager Subject: Re: [9front] vac crash in libthread threadexitsall() Reply-To: 9front@9front.org Precedence: bulk > > is there a way to reproduce it? > > maybe you can make a memory snapshot if the process with > snap(4) when it happens again. This happens consistently if the backup has a vac file in it with merge, i believe.